From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] MIPS: BPF: JIT fixes and improvements. Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 17:36:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20170314.173645.1126342566528886979.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20170314212144.29988-1-david.daney@cavium.com> <20170314.172937.1289357366273291363.davem@davemloft.net> <1d09f001-aa15-e3bf-be85-a13b1132a12a@caviumnetworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: david.daney@cavium.com, ralf@linux-mips.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, james.hogan@imgtec.com, ast@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, steven.hill@cavium.com To: ddaney@caviumnetworks.com Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1d09f001-aa15-e3bf-be85-a13b1132a12a@caviumnetworks.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: David Daney Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 17:34:02 -0700 > On 03/14/2017 05:29 PM, David Miller wrote: >> From: David Daney >> Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 14:21:39 -0700 >> >>> Changes from v1: >>> >>> - Use unsigned access for SKF_AD_HATYPE >>> >>> - Added three more patches for other problems found. >>> >>> >>> Testing the BPF JIT on Cavium OCTEON (mips64) with the test-bpf module >>> identified some failures and unimplemented features. >>> >>> With this patch set we get: >>> >>> test_bpf: Summary: 305 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [85/297 JIT'ed] >>> >>> Both big and little endian tested. >>> >>> We still lack eBPF support, but this is better than nothing. >> >> What tree are you targetting with these changes? Do you expect >> them to go via the MIPS or the net-next tree? >> >> Please be explicit about this in the future. >> > > Sorry I didn't mention it. > > My expectation is that Ralf would merge it via the MIPS tree, as it is > fully contained within arch/mips/* Great, thanks for letting me know.