From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [RFC v1 for accelerated IPoIB 05/25] IB/ipoib: Support ipoib acceleration options callbacks Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 09:58:02 -0600 Message-ID: <20170315155802.GB29562@obsidianresearch.com> References: <1489429896-10781-1-git-send-email-erezsh@mellanox.com> <1489429896-10781-6-git-send-email-erezsh@mellanox.com> <20170314063538.GB79937@knc-06.sc.intel.com> <20170314160021.GD3244@obsidianresearch.com> <20170315064751.GD2079@mtr-leonro.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Erez Shitrit , "Vishwanathapura, Niranjana" , Erez Shitrit , Doug Ledford , "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, valex@mellanox.com, saedm@mellanox.com To: Leon Romanovsky Return-path: Received: from quartz.orcorp.ca ([184.70.90.242]:33790 "EHLO quartz.orcorp.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753433AbdCOP6T (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Mar 2017 11:58:19 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170315064751.GD2079@mtr-leonro.local> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 08:47:51AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 10:00:21AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 04:42:55PM +0200, Erez Shitrit wrote: > > > >> + if (!hca->alloc_rdma_netdev) > > > >> + dev = ipoib_create_netdev_default(hca, name, > > > >> ipoib_setup_common); > > > >> + else > > > >> + dev = hca->alloc_rdma_netdev(hca, port, RDMA_NETDEV_IPOIB, > > > >> + name, NET_NAME_UNKNOWN, > > > >> + ipoib_setup_common); > > > >> + if (!dev) { > > > >> + kfree(priv); > > > >> + return NULL; > > > >> + } > > > > > > > > > > > > This will break ipoib on hfi1 as hfi1 will define alloc_rdma_netdev for > > > > OPA_VNIC type. We should probably look for a dedicated return type > > > > (-ENODEV?) to determine of the driver supports specified rdma netdev type. > > > > Or use a ib device attribute to suggest driver support ipoib rdma netdev. > > > > > > sorry, I don't understand that, we are in ipoib driver, so the type is > > > RDMA_NETDEV_IPOIB, if hfi wants to implement it should use the same > > > flag, and to use OPA_VNIC for vnic. > > > > He means it should look like this: > > > > if (hca->alloc_rdma_netdev) > > dev = hca->alloc_rdma_netdev(hca, port, RDMA_NETDEV_IPOIB, > > name, NET_NAME_UNKNOWN, > > ipoib_setup_common); > > > > if (IS_ERR(dev) && PTR_ERR(dev) != ENOTSUP) > > goto out; > > > > dev = ipoib_create_netdev_default(hca, name, ipoib_setup_common); > > if (IS_ERR(dev)) > > goto out; > > > > WARN_ON(dev == NULL); > > > > [...] > > > > out: > > return PTR_ERR(dev); > > > > And I'm confused why 'ipoib_create_netdev_default' doesn't need the > > same function signature as hca->alloc_rdma_netdev > > And now, I'm confused. > In your's proposal, the "dev" will be overwritten, in Erez's proposal, > "dev" will be one of two: defaults or device specific. Well, not Erez's version allowed dev to be ERR_PTR too. More like this then struct rdma_netdev *get_netdev(..) { if (hca-alloc_rdma_netdev) { dev = hca-alloc_rdma_netdev(hca, port, RDMA_NETDEV_IPOIB, name, NET_NAME_UNKNOWN, ipoib_setup_common); if (!IS_ERR(dev) || PTR_ERR(dev) != ENOTSUP) return dev; } return ipoib_create_netdev_default(hca, name, ipoib_setup_common); } Jason