From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/8] ptr_ring: introduce batch dequeuing
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:43:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170322153638-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1490069087-4783-2-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com>
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:04:40PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> ---
> include/linux/ptr_ring.h | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/ptr_ring.h b/include/linux/ptr_ring.h
> index 6c70444..4771ded 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ptr_ring.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ptr_ring.h
> @@ -247,6 +247,22 @@ static inline void *__ptr_ring_consume(struct ptr_ring *r)
> return ptr;
> }
>
> +static inline int __ptr_ring_consume_batched(struct ptr_ring *r,
> + void **array, int n)
> +{
> + void *ptr;
> + int i = 0;
> +
> + while (i < n) {
> + ptr = __ptr_ring_consume(r);
> + if (!ptr)
> + break;
> + array[i++] = ptr;
> + }
> +
> + return i;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Note: resize (below) nests producer lock within consumer lock, so if you
> * call this in interrupt or BH context, you must disable interrupts/BH when
This ignores the comment above that function:
/* Note: callers invoking this in a loop must use a compiler barrier,
* for example cpu_relax().
*/
Also - it looks like it shouldn't matter if reads are reordered but I wonder.
Thoughts? Including some reasoning about it in commit log would be nice.
> @@ -297,6 +313,55 @@ static inline void *ptr_ring_consume_bh(struct ptr_ring *r)
> return ptr;
> }
>
> +static inline int ptr_ring_consume_batched(struct ptr_ring *r,
> + void **array, int n)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + spin_lock(&r->consumer_lock);
> + ret = __ptr_ring_consume_batched(r, array, n);
> + spin_unlock(&r->consumer_lock);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int ptr_ring_consume_batched_irq(struct ptr_ring *r,
> + void **array, int n)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + spin_lock_irq(&r->consumer_lock);
> + ret = __ptr_ring_consume_batched(r, array, n);
> + spin_unlock_irq(&r->consumer_lock);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int ptr_ring_consume_batched_any(struct ptr_ring *r,
> + void **array, int n)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> + int ret;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&r->consumer_lock, flags);
> + ret = __ptr_ring_consume_batched(r, array, n);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&r->consumer_lock, flags);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int ptr_ring_consume_batched_bh(struct ptr_ring *r,
> + void **array, int n)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + spin_lock_bh(&r->consumer_lock);
> + ret = __ptr_ring_consume_batched(r, array, n);
> + spin_unlock_bh(&r->consumer_lock);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> /* Cast to structure type and call a function without discarding from FIFO.
> * Function must return a value.
> * Callers must take consumer_lock.
> --
> 2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-22 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-21 4:04 [PATCH net-next 0/8] vhost-net rx batching Jason Wang
2017-03-21 4:04 ` [PATCH net-next 1/8] ptr_ring: introduce batch dequeuing Jason Wang
2017-03-21 10:25 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2017-03-22 3:16 ` Jason Wang
2017-03-22 13:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2017-03-23 5:33 ` Jason Wang
2017-03-21 4:04 ` [PATCH net-next 2/8] skb_array: " Jason Wang
2017-03-21 4:04 ` [PATCH net-next 3/8] tun: export skb_array Jason Wang
2017-03-21 4:04 ` [PATCH net-next 4/8] tap: " Jason Wang
2017-03-21 4:04 ` [PATCH net-next 5/8] tun: support receiving skb through msg_control Jason Wang
2017-03-21 4:04 ` [PATCH net-next 6/8] tap: support receiving skb from msg_control Jason Wang
2017-03-21 4:04 ` [PATCH net-next 7/8] vhost_net: try batch dequing from skb array Jason Wang
2017-03-22 14:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-03-23 5:34 ` Jason Wang
2017-03-29 9:58 ` Jason Wang
2017-03-29 10:46 ` Pankaj Gupta
2017-03-29 10:53 ` Jason Wang
2017-03-29 21:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-03-21 4:04 ` [PATCH net-next 8/8] vhost_net: use lockless peeking for skb array during busy polling Jason Wang
2017-03-29 12:07 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-03-30 2:16 ` Jason Wang
2017-03-30 2:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-03-30 3:53 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170322153638-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).