netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com>
To: Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com>
Cc: peppe.cavallaro@st.com, alexandre.torgue@st.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: stmmac: Performance regression after commit aff3d9eff843 "net: stmmac: enable multiple buffers"
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 11:20:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170323102037.GD16625@Red> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <68200e05-04fd-1cc1-f6d6-f77e9e6f1d9d@synopsys.com>

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 10:12:18AM +0000, Joao Pinto wrote:
> 
> Hi Corentin,
> 
> Às 10:08 AM de 3/23/2017, Corentin Labbe escreveu:
> > Hello
> > 
> > Using next-20170323 produce a huge performance regression on my sunxi boards.
> > On dwmac-sun8i, iperf goes from 94mbs/s to 37 when sending.
> > 
> > On cubieboard2(dwmac-sunxi), iperf made the kernel flood with "ndesc_get_rx_status: Oversized frame spanned multiple buffers"
> > and network is lost after.
> > 
> > Reverting aff3d9eff84399e433c4aca65a9bb236581bc082 fix the issue.
> > I still try to found which part of this patch mades the performance lower.
> > 
> > Regards
> > Corentin Labbe
> > 
> 
> I have a 4.21 QoS Core with 4 RX + 4 TX and detected no regression.
> Could you please share the iperf cmds you are using in order for me to reproduce
> in my side?

simple iperf -c serverip for both board

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-23 10:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-23 10:08 stmmac: Performance regression after commit aff3d9eff843 "net: stmmac: enable multiple buffers" Corentin Labbe
2017-03-23 10:12 ` Joao Pinto
2017-03-23 10:20   ` Corentin Labbe [this message]
2017-03-23 10:40     ` Joao Pinto
2017-03-23 10:48       ` Giuseppe CAVALLARO
2017-03-23 10:51         ` Giuseppe CAVALLARO
2017-03-23 10:56           ` Joao Pinto
2017-03-23 12:55             ` Joao Pinto
2017-03-23 10:54         ` Joao Pinto

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170323102037.GD16625@Red \
    --to=clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com \
    --cc=Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peppe.cavallaro@st.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).