From: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>
To: Denny Page <dennypage@me.com>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Benc <jbenc@redhat.com>,
"Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Subject: Re: Extending socket timestamping API for NTP
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 10:45:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170324094530.GE8192@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6121D504-288F-4C9B-9AB3-D1C8292965D5@me.com>
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 10:08:00AM -0700, Denny Page wrote:
> > On Mar 23, 2017, at 09:21, Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > After becoming a bit more familiar with the code I don't think this is
> > a good idea anymore :). I suspect there would be a noticeable
> > performance impact if each timestamped packet could trigger reading of
> > the current link speed. If the value had to be cached it would make
> > more sense to do it in the application.
>
> I am very surprised at this. The application caching approach requires the application retrieve the value via a system call. The system call overhead is huge in comparison to everything else. More importantly, the application cached value may be wrong. If the application takes a sample every 5 seconds, there are 5 seconds of timestamps that can be wildly wrong.
I'm just trying to be practical and minimize the performance impact
and the amount of code that needs to be written, reviewed and
maintained.
How common is to have link speed changing in normal operation on LAN?
There are other problems with changing link speed. It does not affect
only the transposition.
- If the change happens during a measurement, anywhere on the path
between the server and client, the measured offset will have an
error due to the asymmetry in the network delay. An NTP measurement
in the basic mode is short (it's just the rount-trip time), so it's
not very likely to be hit by a link speed change, but in the
interleaved mode the probability is exactly the opposite.
- Even if the measurement is not hit and the measured offset is
accurate, the change in the measured delay may confuse the NTP
client (e.g. temporarily disrupt its sample filtering).
- The TX/RX compensation values depend on the link speed. If the
application doesn't reliably know link speed for each packet, the
compensation cannot be reliable either.
It seems to me for best timekeeping with NTP it is necessary to make
sure the link speed in the network is constant, even if the
transposition was always accurate.
--
Miroslav Lichvar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-24 9:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-07 14:01 Extending socket timestamping API for NTP Miroslav Lichvar
2017-02-07 17:45 ` Keller, Jacob E
2017-02-07 22:32 ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-02-08 14:18 ` Soheil Hassas Yeganeh
2017-02-27 15:23 ` Miroslav Lichvar
2017-02-28 0:01 ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-02-28 8:26 ` Miroslav Lichvar
2017-02-28 21:05 ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-02-08 1:52 ` Denny Page
2017-02-08 5:27 ` Richard Cochran
2017-02-08 5:48 ` Denny Page
2017-02-08 17:27 ` Denny Page
2017-02-07 18:54 ` Soheil Hassas Yeganeh
2017-02-08 10:14 ` Miroslav Lichvar
2017-02-07 20:37 ` sdncurious
2017-02-08 10:26 ` Miroslav Lichvar
2017-02-08 23:27 ` sdncurious
2017-02-08 23:34 ` sdncurious
2017-02-08 1:18 ` Denny Page
[not found] ` <CAHoNx58u=Fze4e5V2Wb_LiBhka1Mzny3zOVNfvuzjnmQ4wBO=Q@mail.gmail.com>
2017-02-08 3:06 ` Denny Page
2017-02-09 0:45 ` Denny Page
2017-02-09 11:15 ` Miroslav Lichvar
2017-02-09 20:25 ` Denny Page
2017-02-09 8:02 ` Richard Cochran
2017-02-09 11:09 ` Miroslav Lichvar
2017-02-09 19:42 ` sdncurious
2017-02-09 20:37 ` Denny Page
2017-02-10 0:33 ` Denny Page
2017-02-10 18:55 ` Denny Page
2017-03-23 16:21 ` Miroslav Lichvar
2017-03-23 18:54 ` Denny Page
2017-03-23 19:07 ` Richard Cochran
2017-03-24 7:25 ` Miroslav Lichvar
[not found] ` <6121D504-288F-4C9B-9AB3-D1C8292965D5@me.com>
2017-03-24 9:45 ` Miroslav Lichvar [this message]
2017-03-24 17:17 ` Denny Page
2017-03-24 18:52 ` Keller, Jacob E
2017-03-27 10:13 ` Miroslav Lichvar
2017-03-27 14:29 ` Richard Cochran
2017-03-27 16:25 ` Denny Page
2017-03-27 18:28 ` Richard Cochran
2017-03-27 19:18 ` Denny Page
2017-03-27 20:58 ` Richard Cochran
2017-03-27 21:20 ` Denny Page
2017-03-27 19:21 ` Denny Page
2017-03-27 19:21 ` Denny Page
[not found] ` <5FD283AB-39DE-4A9D-902A-BA5F0F0B62A3@me.com>
2017-03-27 21:00 ` Richard Cochran
2017-03-24 9:55 ` Jiri Benc
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170324094530.GE8192@localhost \
--to=mlichvar@redhat.com \
--cc=dennypage@me.com \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=jbenc@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).