From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Grant Grundler <grundler@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cfg80211: Fix array-bounds warning in fragment copy
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 12:32:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170327193242.GD84219@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1490611679.3393.0.camel@sipsolutions.net>
El Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:47:59PM +0200 Johannes Berg ha dit:
> On Fri, 2017-03-24 at 18:06 -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > __ieee80211_amsdu_copy_frag intentionally initializes a pointer to
> > array[-1] to increment it later to valid values. clang rightfully
> > generates an array-bounds warning on the initialization statement.
> > Work around this by initializing the pointer to array[0] and
> > decrementing it later, which allows to leave the rest of the
> > algorithm untouched.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
> > ---
> > net/wireless/util.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/wireless/util.c b/net/wireless/util.c
> > index 68e5f2ecee1a..d3d459e4a070 100644
> > --- a/net/wireless/util.c
> > +++ b/net/wireless/util.c
> > @@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ __ieee80211_amsdu_copy_frag(struct sk_buff *skb,
> > struct sk_buff *frame,
> > int offset, int len)
> > {
> > struct skb_shared_info *sh = skb_shinfo(skb);
> > - const skb_frag_t *frag = &sh->frags[-1];
> > + const skb_frag_t *frag = &sh->frags[0];
> > struct page *frag_page;
> > void *frag_ptr;
> > int frag_len, frag_size;
> > @@ -669,6 +669,7 @@ __ieee80211_amsdu_copy_frag(struct sk_buff *skb,
> > struct sk_buff *frame,
> > frag_page = virt_to_head_page(skb->head);
> > frag_ptr = skb->data;
> > frag_size = head_size;
> > + frag--;
>
> Isn't it just a question of time until the compiler will see through
> this trick and warn about it?
Maybe.
Actually it seems the algorithm can be easily adapted to increment the
pointer after consumption, which is clearer anyway. I will give this a
shot. I'm not sure how to exercise the code path for testing and would
appreciate help on this end.
Matthias
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-27 19:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-25 1:06 [PATCH] cfg80211: Fix array-bounds warning in fragment copy Matthias Kaehlcke
2017-03-27 10:47 ` Johannes Berg
2017-03-27 11:29 ` Felix Fietkau
2017-03-27 11:38 ` Johannes Berg
2017-03-27 19:32 ` Matthias Kaehlcke [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170327193242.GD84219@google.com \
--to=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=grundler@chromium.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nbd@openwrt.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).