netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@redhat.com>,
	Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>,
	brouer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Page allocator order-0 optimizations merged
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 10:29:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170328102910.050cf675@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0873b65b-2217-005d-0b42-4af6ad66cc0f@gmail.com>

On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 10:32:19 +0300
Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 27/03/2017 4:32 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 02:39:47PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:  
> >> On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 10:55:14 +0200
> >> Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>  
> >>> A possible solution, would be use the local_bh_{disable,enable} instead
> >>> of the {preempt_disable,enable} calls.  But it is slower, using numbers
> >>> from [1] (19 vs 11 cycles), thus the expected cycles saving is 38-19=19.
> >>>
> >>> The problematic part of using local_bh_enable is that this adds a
> >>> softirq/bottom-halves rescheduling point (as it checks for pending
> >>> BHs).  Thus, this might affects real workloads.  
> >>
> >> I implemented this solution in patch below... and tested it on mlx5 at
> >> 50G with manually disabled driver-page-recycling.  It works for me.
> >>
> >> To Mel, that do you prefer... a partial-revert or something like this?
> >>  
> >
> > If Tariq confirms it works for him as well, this looks far safer patch  
> 
> Great.
> I will test Jesper's patch today in the afternoon.

Good to hear :-)

> > than having a dedicate IRQ-safe queue. Your concern about the BH
> > scheduling point is valid but if it's proven to be a problem, there is
> > still the option of a partial revert.

I wanted to evaluate my own BH scheduling point concern, but I could
not, because I ran into a softirq acct regression (which I bisected
see[1]).  AFAIK this should not affect Tariq's multi-TCP-stream test
(netperf TCP stream testing works fine on my testlab).

[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170328101403.34a82fbf@redhat.com
-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-28  8:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <58b48b1f.F/jo2/WiSxvvGm/z%akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2017-03-01 13:48 ` Page allocator order-0 optimizations merged Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-03-01 17:36   ` Tariq Toukan
2017-03-22 17:39     ` Tariq Toukan
2017-03-22 23:40       ` Mel Gorman
2017-03-23 13:43         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-03-23 14:51           ` Mel Gorman
2017-03-26  8:21             ` Tariq Toukan
2017-03-26 10:17               ` Tariq Toukan
2017-03-27  7:32                 ` Pankaj Gupta
2017-03-27  8:55                   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-03-27 12:28                     ` Mel Gorman
2017-03-27 12:39                     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-03-27 13:32                       ` Mel Gorman
2017-03-28  7:32                         ` Tariq Toukan
2017-03-28  8:29                           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2017-03-28 16:05                           ` Tariq Toukan
2017-03-28 18:24                             ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-03-29  7:13                               ` Tariq Toukan
2017-03-28  8:28                         ` Pankaj Gupta
2017-03-27 14:15                       ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-03-27 15:15                         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-03-27 16:58                           ` in_irq_or_nmi() Matthew Wilcox
2017-03-29  8:12                             ` in_irq_or_nmi() Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-29  8:59                               ` in_irq_or_nmi() Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-03-29  9:19                                 ` in_irq_or_nmi() Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-29 18:12                                   ` in_irq_or_nmi() Matthew Wilcox
2017-03-29 19:11                                     ` in_irq_or_nmi() Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-03-29 19:44                                       ` in_irq_or_nmi() and RFC patch Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-03-30  6:49                                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-30  7:12                                           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-03-30  7:35                                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-30  9:46                                               ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-03-30 13:04                                         ` Mel Gorman
2017-03-30 15:07                                           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-04-03 12:05                                             ` Mel Gorman
2017-04-05  8:53                                               ` Mel Gorman
2017-04-10 14:31   ` Page allocator order-0 optimizations merged zhong jiang
2017-04-10 15:10     ` Mel Gorman
2017-04-11  1:54       ` zhong jiang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170328102910.050cf675@redhat.com \
    --to=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pagupta@redhat.com \
    --cc=saeedm@mellanox.com \
    --cc=tariqt@mellanox.com \
    --cc=ttoukan.linux@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).