From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/4] ixgbe: sparc: rename the ARCH_WANT_RELAX_ORDER to IXGBE_ALLOW_RELAXED_ORDER Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 11:26:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20170401.112603.1991545644693496714.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1491031554-19516-1-git-send-email-dingtianhong@huawei.com> <1491031554-19516-2-git-send-email-dingtianhong@huawei.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, robin.murphy@arm.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, alexander.duyck@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: dingtianhong@huawei.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:56574 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751791AbdDAS0K (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Apr 2017 14:26:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1491031554-19516-2-git-send-email-dingtianhong@huawei.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Ding Tianhong Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2017 15:25:51 +0800 > Till now only the Intel ixgbe could support enable > Relaxed ordering in the drivers for special architecture, > but the ARCH_WANT_RELAX_ORDER is looks like a general name > for all arch, so rename to a specific name for intel > card looks more appropriate. > > Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong This is not a driver specific facility. Any driver can test this symbol and act accordingly. Just because IXGBE is the first and only user, doesn't mean the facility is driver specific. Thank you.