netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH net-next] sfc: don't insert mc_list on low-latency firmware if it's too long
@ 2017-04-04 16:02 Edward Cree
  2017-04-06  1:36 ` David Miller
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Edward Cree @ 2017-04-04 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: davem; +Cc: linux-net-drivers, netdev

If the mc_list is longer than 256 addresses, we enter mc_promisc mode.
If we're in mc_promisc mode and the firmware doesn't support cascaded
 multicast, normally we also insert our mc_list, to prevent stealing by
 another VI.  However, if the mc_list was too long, this isn't really
 helpful - the MC groups that didn't fit in the list can still get
 stolen, and having only some of them stealable will probably cause
 more confusing behaviour than having them all stealable.  Since
 inserting 256 multicast filters takes a long time and can lead to MCDI
 state machine timeouts, just skip the mc_list insert in this overflow
 condition.

Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c | 10 ++++++++--
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c
index c60c2d4..78efb28 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c
@@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ struct efx_ef10_filter_table {
 	bool mc_promisc;
 /* Whether in multicast promiscuous mode when last changed */
 	bool mc_promisc_last;
+	bool mc_overflow; /* Too many MC addrs; should always imply mc_promisc */
 	bool vlan_filter;
 	struct list_head vlan_list;
 };
@@ -5058,6 +5059,7 @@ static void efx_ef10_filter_mc_addr_list(struct efx_nic *efx)
 	struct netdev_hw_addr *mc;
 	unsigned int i, addr_count;
 
+	table->mc_overflow = false;
 	table->mc_promisc = !!(net_dev->flags & (IFF_PROMISC | IFF_ALLMULTI));
 
 	addr_count = netdev_mc_count(net_dev);
@@ -5065,6 +5067,7 @@ static void efx_ef10_filter_mc_addr_list(struct efx_nic *efx)
 	netdev_for_each_mc_addr(mc, net_dev) {
 		if (i >= EFX_EF10_FILTER_DEV_MC_MAX) {
 			table->mc_promisc = true;
+			table->mc_overflow = true;
 			break;
 		}
 		ether_addr_copy(table->dev_mc_list[i].addr, mc->addr);
@@ -5469,12 +5472,15 @@ static void efx_ef10_filter_vlan_sync_rx_mode(struct efx_nic *efx,
 			}
 		} else {
 			/* If we failed to insert promiscuous filters, don't
-			 * rollback.  Regardless, also insert the mc_list
+			 * rollback.  Regardless, also insert the mc_list,
+			 * unless it's incomplete due to overflow
 			 */
 			efx_ef10_filter_insert_def(efx, vlan,
 						   EFX_ENCAP_TYPE_NONE,
 						   true, false);
-			efx_ef10_filter_insert_addr_list(efx, vlan, true, false);
+			if (!table->mc_overflow)
+				efx_ef10_filter_insert_addr_list(efx, vlan,
+								 true, false);
 		}
 	} else {
 		/* If any filters failed to insert, rollback and fall back to

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-04-06  1:36 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-04-04 16:02 [PATCH net-next] sfc: don't insert mc_list on low-latency firmware if it's too long Edward Cree
2017-04-06  1:36 ` David Miller

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).