From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
Cc: nbd-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
linux-scsi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Michal Hocko <mhocko-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
linux-block-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org,
Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>,
Andrey Ryabinin
<aryabinin-5HdwGun5lf+gSpxsJD1C4w@public.gmane.org>,
open-iscsi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org,
Mel Gorman
<mgorman-3eNAlZScCAx27rWaFMvyedHuzzzSOjJt@public.gmane.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] mm: prevent potential recursive reclaim due to clearing PF_MEMALLOC
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 09:46:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170405074700.29871-2-vbabka@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170405074700.29871-1-vbabka-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
The function __alloc_pages_direct_compact() sets PF_MEMALLOC to prevent
deadlock during page migration by lock_page() (see the comment in
__unmap_and_move()). Then it unconditionally clears the flag, which can clear a
pre-existing PF_MEMALLOC flag and result in recursive reclaim. This was not a
problem until commit a8161d1ed609 ("mm, page_alloc: restructure direct
compaction handling in slowpath"), because direct compation was called only
after direct reclaim, which was skipped when PF_MEMALLOC flag was set.
Even now it's only a theoretical issue, as the new callsite of
__alloc_pages_direct_compact() is reached only for costly orders and when
gfp_pfmemalloc_allowed() is true, which means either __GFP_NOMEMALLOC is in
gfp_flags or in_interrupt() is true. There is no such known context, but let's
play it safe and make __alloc_pages_direct_compact() robust for cases where
PF_MEMALLOC is already set.
Fixes: a8161d1ed609 ("mm, page_alloc: restructure direct compaction handling in slowpath")
Reported-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin-5HdwGun5lf+gSpxsJD1C4w@public.gmane.org>
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: <stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 3589f8be53be..b84e6ffbe756 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -3288,6 +3288,7 @@ __alloc_pages_direct_compact(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
enum compact_priority prio, enum compact_result *compact_result)
{
struct page *page;
+ unsigned int noreclaim_flag = current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC;
if (!order)
return NULL;
@@ -3295,7 +3296,7 @@ __alloc_pages_direct_compact(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
current->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC;
*compact_result = try_to_compact_pages(gfp_mask, order, alloc_flags, ac,
prio);
- current->flags &= ~PF_MEMALLOC;
+ current->flags = (current->flags & ~PF_MEMALLOC) | noreclaim_flag;
if (*compact_result <= COMPACT_INACTIVE)
return NULL;
--
2.12.2
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-05 7:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-05 7:46 [PATCH 0/4] more robust PF_MEMALLOC handling Vlastimil Babka
2017-04-05 7:46 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm: introduce memalloc_noreclaim_{save,restore} Vlastimil Babka
[not found] ` <20170405074700.29871-3-vbabka-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-05 11:28 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm: introduce memalloc_noreclaim_{save, restore} Michal Hocko
2017-04-07 7:38 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm: introduce memalloc_noreclaim_{save,restore} Hillf Danton
[not found] ` <20170405074700.29871-1-vbabka-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-05 7:46 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2017-04-05 11:21 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm: prevent potential recursive reclaim due to clearing PF_MEMALLOC Michal Hocko
2017-04-05 11:40 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2017-04-07 9:21 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-04-07 7:33 ` Hillf Danton
2017-04-05 7:46 ` [PATCH 3/4] treewide: convert PF_MEMALLOC manipulations to new helpers Vlastimil Babka
[not found] ` <20170405074700.29871-4-vbabka-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-05 11:30 ` Michal Hocko
[not found] ` <20170405113030.GL6035-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-06 6:38 ` Wouter Verhelst
2017-04-06 11:25 ` [Nbd] " Mel Gorman
2017-04-05 7:47 ` [PATCH 4/4] mtd: nand: nandsim: convert to memalloc_noreclaim_*() Vlastimil Babka
2017-04-05 11:31 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-05 11:36 ` Richard Weinberger
2017-04-05 11:39 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-04-05 12:09 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-06 6:33 ` Adrian Hunter
[not found] ` <fe1c21a4-0bc6-529c-5446-382b01d4c99e-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-06 7:27 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170405074700.29871-2-vbabka@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka-alswssmvlrq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
--cc=aryabinin-5HdwGun5lf+gSpxsJD1C4w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-block-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-scsi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mgorman-3eNAlZScCAx27rWaFMvyedHuzzzSOjJt@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mhocko-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=nbd-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=open-iscsi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox