From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] crypto: CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME is too low
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 23:14:31 +0200
Message-ID: <20170406211431.GD12763@secunet.com>
References: <e96825bd-4e1d-c6c1-160e-0dc10f7f3981@nokia.com>
 <367298c5-aa5d-3708-72d0-8a44702d0caa@nokia.com>
 <20170406081509.GB30557@gondor.apana.org.au>
 <20170406.135832.1914702009261438916.davem@davemloft.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>, <alexander.sverdlin@nokia.com>,
        <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Return-path: <linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170406.135832.1914702009261438916.davem@davemloft.net>
Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 01:58:32PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
> Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 16:15:09 +0800
> 
> > As the final patch depends on all three it would be easiest if
> > we pushed the xfrm patch through the crypto tree.  Steffen/David?
> 
> No objections from me for this going through the crypto tree.

I have no objections too.