From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mlxsw: convert to pci_alloc_irq_vectors Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 07:06:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20170410.070616.478356283361143853.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20170407130808.GA31087@splinter> <20170407.071405.627036901988213530.davem@davemloft.net> <20170410073551.GA6036@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: idosch@idosch.org, jiri@mellanox.com, idosch@mellanox.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: hch@lst.de Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:45502 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752518AbdDJOGR (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Apr 2017 10:06:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20170410073551.GA6036@lst.de> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Christoph Hellwig Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:35:51 +0200 > On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 07:14:05AM -0700, David Miller wrote: >> >> For net-next: >> > >> > I noticed this is marked as "Not Applicable" in patchwork: >> > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/747723/ >> > >> > But I'm not quite sure why. Maybe you meant to mark only v1? >> > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/747674/ >> >> If the last patch of his series removes a kernel global API, >> it shouldn't go via my tree. He can send it directly to Linus >> or via the PCI maintainer. > > This is a single patch that does not remove anything. > > For the different series I explicitly asked if it's okay if the whole > thing goes in through the net tree and Bjorn was fine it. If you're > not it would be nice if you could state that in the series so that > the submitter can act on it. My bad I thought this was part of that series. Could you do me a favor and repost that series, with this mlxsw patch added to it. I will apply it to net-next. Thanks!