From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mlxsw: convert to pci_alloc_irq_vectors Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:35:51 +0200 Message-ID: <20170410073551.GA6036@lst.de> References: <20170406122303.30758-1-hch@lst.de> <20170406124320.GA5456@splinter.mtl.com> <20170407130808.GA31087@splinter> <20170407.071405.627036901988213530.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: idosch@idosch.org, hch@lst.de, jiri@mellanox.com, idosch@mellanox.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:49172 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751266AbdDJHfw (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Apr 2017 03:35:52 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170407.071405.627036901988213530.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 07:14:05AM -0700, David Miller wrote: > >> For net-next: > > > > I noticed this is marked as "Not Applicable" in patchwork: > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/747723/ > > > > But I'm not quite sure why. Maybe you meant to mark only v1? > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/747674/ > > If the last patch of his series removes a kernel global API, > it shouldn't go via my tree. He can send it directly to Linus > or via the PCI maintainer. This is a single patch that does not remove anything. For the different series I explicitly asked if it's okay if the whole thing goes in through the net tree and Bjorn was fine it. If you're not it would be nice if you could state that in the series so that the submitter can act on it.