From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexei Starovoitov Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next RFC] net: Generic XDP Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 17:59:51 -0700 Message-ID: <20170415005949.GB73685@ast-mbp.thefacebook.com> References: <20170413.120925.2082322246776478766.davem@davemloft.net> <20170413.162315.1889531431093534154.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: michael.chan@broadcom.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, xdp-newbies@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-f193.google.com ([209.85.192.193]:34837 "EHLO mail-pf0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755930AbdDOA74 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Apr 2017 20:59:56 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170413.162315.1889531431093534154.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 04:23:15PM -0400, David Miller wrote: > + > + switch (act) { > + case XDP_TX: > + __skb_push(skb, skb->mac_len); s/skb->mac_len/mac_len/ > + HARD_TX_UNLOCK(dev, txq); > + if (free_skb) { > + trace_xdp_exception(dev, xdp_prog, XDP_TX); > + kfree_skb(skb); nice that you didn't forget to add trace_xdp_exception in this path :) Overall looks good to me and other than the minor nit in tx, i think it should work for programs already used with in-driver xdp. I'll test it next week unless people beat me to it.