From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Subject: [PATCH next RFC] net: sched: mirred: move xmit to tasklet
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 15:03:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170418130331.14268-1-fw@strlen.de> (raw)
mirred is prone to deadlocks as it invokes dev_queue_xmit while
holding one or more qdisc locks.
Avoid lock recursions by moving tx context to a tasklet.
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
---
This a stab at removing the lock recursions discussed during netconf.
Taking the cost of the tasklet appears to be the only solution;
i tried to use a percpu 'history' instead but its not clear to
me that this avoids all corner cases.
While this patch doesn't avoid loops we don't hang the kernel
anymore and removing the 'looping' filter makes things calm
down again (there are also other ways to create such loops anyway,
including use of a cable... )
diff --git a/net/sched/act_mirred.c b/net/sched/act_mirred.c
index 1b5549ababd4..3dd61eba4741 100644
--- a/net/sched/act_mirred.c
+++ b/net/sched/act_mirred.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
#include <linux/string.h>
#include <linux/errno.h>
#include <linux/skbuff.h>
+#include <linux/skb_array.h>
#include <linux/rtnetlink.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
@@ -25,10 +26,19 @@
#include <net/net_namespace.h>
#include <net/netlink.h>
#include <net/pkt_sched.h>
+#include <net/dst.h>
#include <linux/tc_act/tc_mirred.h>
#include <net/tc_act/tc_mirred.h>
+#define MIRRED_TXLEN 512
#define MIRRED_TAB_MASK 7
+
+struct mirred_tx_data {
+ struct tasklet_struct mirred_tasklet;
+ struct skb_array skb_array;
+};
+
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct mirred_tx_data, mirred_tx_data);
static LIST_HEAD(mirred_list);
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(mirred_list_lock);
@@ -158,6 +168,44 @@ static int tcf_mirred_init(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
return ret;
}
+static void mirred_tasklet(unsigned long data)
+{
+ struct mirred_tx_data *d = (void *)data;
+ struct sk_buff *skb;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < MIRRED_TXLEN; i++) {
+ struct net_device *dev;
+
+ skb = skb_array_consume(&d->skb_array);
+ if (!skb)
+ return;
+
+ dev = skb->dev;
+ dev_queue_xmit(skb);
+ dev_put(dev);
+ }
+
+ tasklet_schedule(&d->mirred_tasklet);
+}
+
+static int mirred_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ struct mirred_tx_data *d = this_cpu_ptr(&mirred_tx_data);
+
+ skb_dst_force(skb);
+ dev_hold(skb->dev);
+
+ if (skb_array_produce_bh(&d->skb_array, skb)) {
+ dev_put(skb->dev);
+ kfree_skb(skb);
+ return -ENOBUFS;
+ }
+
+ tasklet_schedule(&d->mirred_tasklet);
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int tcf_mirred(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct tc_action *a,
struct tcf_result *res)
{
@@ -217,7 +265,7 @@ static int tcf_mirred(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct tc_action *a,
skb2->skb_iif = skb->dev->ifindex;
skb2->dev = dev;
if (!tcf_mirred_act_wants_ingress(m_eaction))
- err = dev_queue_xmit(skb2);
+ err = mirred_xmit(skb2);
else
err = netif_receive_skb(skb2);
@@ -365,20 +413,66 @@ MODULE_AUTHOR("Jamal Hadi Salim(2002)");
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Device Mirror/redirect actions");
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
+static void mirred_cleanup_pcpu(void)
+{
+ int cpu;
+
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+ struct mirred_tx_data *data;
+
+ data = per_cpu_ptr(&mirred_tx_data, cpu);
+
+ skb_array_cleanup(&data->skb_array);
+ tasklet_kill(&data->mirred_tasklet);
+ }
+}
+
static int __init mirred_init_module(void)
{
- int err = register_netdevice_notifier(&mirred_device_notifier);
- if (err)
+ int cpu, err;
+
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+ struct mirred_tx_data *data;
+
+ data = per_cpu_ptr(&mirred_tx_data, cpu);
+
+ tasklet_init(&data->mirred_tasklet, mirred_tasklet,
+ (unsigned long)data);
+ err = skb_array_init(&data->skb_array, MIRRED_TXLEN, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (err) {
+ unregister_netdevice_notifier(&mirred_device_notifier);
+
+ while (cpu) {
+ data = per_cpu_ptr(&mirred_tx_data, --cpu);
+ skb_array_cleanup(&data->skb_array);
+ }
+
+ return err;
+ }
+ }
+
+ err = register_netdevice_notifier(&mirred_device_notifier);
+ if (err) {
+ mirred_cleanup_pcpu();
+ return err;
+ }
+
+ err = tcf_register_action(&act_mirred_ops, &mirred_net_ops);
+ if (err) {
+ unregister_netdevice_notifier(&mirred_device_notifier);
+ mirred_cleanup_pcpu();
return err;
+ }
pr_info("Mirror/redirect action on\n");
- return tcf_register_action(&act_mirred_ops, &mirred_net_ops);
+ return 0;
}
static void __exit mirred_cleanup_module(void)
{
tcf_unregister_action(&act_mirred_ops, &mirred_net_ops);
unregister_netdevice_notifier(&mirred_device_notifier);
+ mirred_cleanup_pcpu();
}
module_init(mirred_init_module);
--
2.10.2
next reply other threads:[~2017-04-18 13:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-18 13:03 Florian Westphal [this message]
2017-04-18 16:18 ` [PATCH next RFC] net: sched: mirred: move xmit to tasklet Eric Dumazet
2017-04-18 17:15 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170418130331.14268-1-fw@strlen.de \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).