netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	michael.chan@broadcom.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	xdp-newbies@vger.kernel.org, brouer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next RFC] net: Generic XDP
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 22:26:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170418222616.4761a781@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170418190535.GG4730@C02RW35GFVH8.dhcp.broadcom.net>


On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 15:05:35 -0400 Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 05:59:51PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 04:23:15PM -0400, David Miller wrote:  
> > > +
> > > +	switch (act) {
> > > +	case XDP_TX:
> > > +		__skb_push(skb, skb->mac_len);  
> > 
> > s/skb->mac_len/mac_len/
> >   
> 
[...]
> 
> When using this change above suggested by Alexei, XDP_DROP and XDP_TX
> actions appear to work well with xdp1 and xdp2.

Also adjusted patch accordingly.

Ran a few quick tests today, but just against an really old e1000 NIC
attached to a PCI-bus (32bit).  There were not difference between DROP
and PASS, but this is likely due to a NIC HW limit.

Sender were sending 951,146 pps (<= tx_queue_0_packets /sec)

$ sudo ./xdp_bench01_mem_access_cost --readmem --action XDP_DROP --dev e1000
XDP_action   pps        pps-human-readable mem      
XDP_DROP     671975     671,975            read     
XDP_DROP     671997     671,997            read     
XDP_DROP     672061     672,061            read     
XDP_DROP     671861     671,861            read     
^CInterrupted: Removing XDP program on ifindex:2 device:e1000

$ sudo ./xdp_bench01_mem_access_cost --readmem --action XDP_PASS --dev e1000
XDP_action   pps        pps-human-readable mem      
XDP_PASS     672032     672,032            read     
XDP_PASS     671910     671,910            read     
XDP_PASS     671926     671,926            read     
XDP_PASS     671947     671,947            read     
^CInterrupted: Removing XDP program on ifindex:2 device:e1000

Program xdp_bench01_mem_access_cost avail here:
 https://github.com/netoptimizer/prototype-kernel/tree/master/kernel/samples/bpf

-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-04-18 20:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-13 16:09 [PATCH v4 net-next RFC] net: Generic XDP David Miller
2017-04-13 20:16 ` Michael Chan
2017-04-13 20:23   ` David Miller
2017-04-14  1:59     ` [lkp-robot] [net] d1dff7db3b: net/core/dev.c:#suspicious_rcu_dereference_check()usage kernel test robot
2017-04-15  0:59     ` [PATCH v4 net-next RFC] net: Generic XDP Alexei Starovoitov
2017-04-15 15:46       ` David Ahern
2017-04-18 19:05       ` Andy Gospodarek
2017-04-18 19:07         ` David Miller
2017-04-18 19:29           ` David Miller
2017-04-18 19:37             ` Andy Gospodarek
2017-04-19 14:29             ` Andy Gospodarek
2017-04-19 17:17               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-04-19 17:44                 ` John Fastabend
2017-04-19 20:25                   ` Andy Gospodarek
2017-04-20  0:13                     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-04-20  1:40               ` David Miller
2017-04-20 22:09                 ` Andy Gospodarek
2017-04-20 14:30               ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-04-24 13:18                 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-04-18 20:26         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2017-04-14 16:33 ` William Tu
2017-04-24 14:24 ` Blogpost evaluation this " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-04-24 22:26   ` David Miller
2017-04-25  8:28     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-04-25 17:25     ` Andy Gospodarek
2017-04-25 17:31       ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170418222616.4761a781@redhat.com \
    --to=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xdp-newbies@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).