From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
To: "Sørensen, Stefan" <Stefan.Sorensen@spectralink.com>
Cc: "dan.carpenter@oracle.com" <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"f.fainelli@gmail.com" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"andrew@lunn.ch" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org"
<kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dp83640: don't recieve time stamps twice
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 12:31:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170419103135.GA1670@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1492593414.3108.1.camel@spectralink.com>
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 09:16:56AM +0000, Sørensen, Stefan wrote:
> You are correct that these lines was added accidentally.
Can we please fix this in another way? There is no need to hold the
spin lock during the callback into the networking stack. Instead, how
about the following diff, which also fixes the other call site...
Thanks,
Richard
---
diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/dp83640.c b/drivers/net/phy/dp83640.c
index e2460a5..593e533 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/dp83640.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/dp83640.c
@@ -874,14 +874,15 @@ static void decode_rxts(struct dp83640_private *dp83640,
shhwtstamps = skb_hwtstamps(skb);
memset(shhwtstamps, 0, sizeof(*shhwtstamps));
shhwtstamps->hwtstamp = ns_to_ktime(rxts->ns);
- netif_rx_ni(skb);
list_add(&rxts->list, &dp83640->rxpool);
break;
}
}
spin_unlock(&dp83640->rx_queue.lock);
- if (!shhwtstamps)
+ if (shhwtstamps)
+ netif_rx_ni(skb);
+ else
list_add_tail(&rxts->list, &dp83640->rxts);
out:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dp83640->rx_lock, flags);
@@ -1425,7 +1426,6 @@ static bool dp83640_rxtstamp(struct phy_device *phydev,
shhwtstamps = skb_hwtstamps(skb);
memset(shhwtstamps, 0, sizeof(*shhwtstamps));
shhwtstamps->hwtstamp = ns_to_ktime(rxts->ns);
- netif_rx_ni(skb);
list_del_init(&rxts->list);
list_add(&rxts->list, &dp83640->rxpool);
break;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-19 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-18 19:14 [PATCH] dp83640: don't recieve time stamps twice Dan Carpenter
2017-04-18 20:19 ` Richard Cochran
2017-04-19 9:16 ` Sørensen, Stefan
2017-04-19 10:31 ` Richard Cochran [this message]
2017-04-19 10:53 ` Dan Carpenter
2017-04-19 11:28 ` Sørensen, Stefan
2017-04-19 11:54 ` Richard Cochran
2017-04-20 20:02 ` David Miller
2017-04-20 21:30 ` Richard Cochran
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170419103135.GA1670@localhost.localdomain \
--to=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=Stefan.Sorensen@spectralink.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).