From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [iproute PATCH] man: ip-rule.8: Further clarify how to interpret priority value
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 11:44:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170424114405.2884a1ee@xeon-e3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170424153537.15072-1-phil@nwl.cc>
On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 17:35:37 +0200
Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc> wrote:
> Despite the past changes, users seemed to get confused by the seemingly
> contradictory relation of priority value and actual rule priority.
>
> Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
Makes sense. Applied.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-24 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-24 15:35 [iproute PATCH] man: ip-rule.8: Further clarify how to interpret priority value Phil Sutter
2017-04-24 18:44 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170424114405.2884a1ee@xeon-e3 \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phil@nwl.cc \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox