netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
	Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com>,
	"Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>,
	Denny Page <dennypage@me.com>, Jiri Benc <jbenc@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/7] net: add option to get information about timestamped packets
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 15:56:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170425135642.GB27148@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF=yD-+ErPH6Qb4y9TcAMi-7X+ebxW3epq3Zxch_vrt1r3gspQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:18:13AM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 5:00 AM, Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Would "skb->data - skb->head -
> > skb->mac_header + skb->len" always work as the L2 length for received
> > packets at the time when the cmsg is prepared?
> 
> (skb->data - skb->head) - skb->mac_header computes the length
> of data before the mac, such as reserve?

data - head includes the reserve, but mac_header does too, so I think
it should be just the length of MAC header and everything up to the
data.

> Do you mean skb->data -
> skb->mac_header (or - skb_mac_offset(skb))?

That would give me a pointer? If I used skb_mac_offset(), the total
length would be just skb->len - skb_mac_offset()?

> > As for the original ifindex, it seems to me it does need to be saved
> > to a new field since __netif_receive_skb_core() intentionally
> > overwrites skb->skb_iif. What would be the best place for it, sk_buff
> > or skb_shared_info?
> 
> Finding storage space on the receive path will not be easy.
> 
> One shortcut to avoid storing this information explicitly is to look up
> the device from skb->napi_id.

Thanks. This looks promising. It will depend on CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL,
but I guess that's ok. It nicely isolates all costs to the timestamping
option.

-- 
Miroslav Lichvar

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-25 13:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-12 14:17 [RFC PATCH 0/7] Extend socket timestamping API Miroslav Lichvar
2017-04-12 14:17 ` [RFC PATCH 1/7] net: define receive timestamp filter for NTP Miroslav Lichvar
2017-04-12 14:17 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] net: ethernet: update drivers to handle HWTSTAMP_FILTER_NTP_ALL Miroslav Lichvar
2017-04-12 19:49   ` Richard Cochran
2017-04-13  9:00   ` Keller, Jacob E
2017-04-12 14:17 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] net: add option to get information about timestamped packets Miroslav Lichvar
2017-04-13 14:37   ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-04-13 15:18     ` Miroslav Lichvar
2017-04-13 16:16       ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-04-24  9:00         ` Miroslav Lichvar
2017-04-24 15:18           ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-04-25 13:56             ` Miroslav Lichvar [this message]
2017-04-25 17:23               ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-04-12 14:17 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] net: ethernet: update drivers to provide timestamping packet info Miroslav Lichvar
2017-04-13  9:04   ` Keller, Jacob E
2017-04-12 14:17 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] net: don't make false software transmit timestamps Miroslav Lichvar
2017-04-12 14:17 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] net: allow simultaneous SW and HW transmit timestamping Miroslav Lichvar
2017-04-13 14:30   ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-04-13 14:59     ` Miroslav Lichvar
2017-04-13 15:24       ` Keller, Jacob E
2017-04-13 16:17         ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-04-12 14:17 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] net: ethernet: update drivers to make both SW and HW TX timestamps Miroslav Lichvar
2017-04-13  9:08 ` [RFC PATCH 0/7] Extend socket timestamping API Keller, Jacob E
2017-04-13  9:53   ` Miroslav Lichvar
2017-04-13 10:45     ` Keller, Jacob E

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170425135642.GB27148@localhost \
    --to=mlichvar@redhat.com \
    --cc=dennypage@me.com \
    --cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
    --cc=jbenc@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=soheil@google.com \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).