From: Craig Gallek <kraigatgoog@gmail.com>
To: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next] ip6_tunnel: Fix missing tunnel encapsulation limit option
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 13:07:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170426170707.165201-1-kraigatgoog@gmail.com> (raw)
From: Craig Gallek <kraig@google.com>
The IPv6 tunneling code tries to insert IPV6_TLV_TNL_ENCAP_LIMIT and
IPV6_TLV_PADN options when an encapsulation limit is defined (the
default is a limit of 4). An MTU adjustment is done to account for
these options as well. However, the options are never present in the
generated packets.
ipv6_push_nfrag_opts requires that IPV6_RTHDR be present in order to
include any IPV6_DSTOPTS options. The v6 tunnel code does not
use routing options, so the encap limit options are not included.
A brief reading of RFC 3542 section 9.2 (specifically the 4th paragraph)
makes me believe that this requirement in the kernel is incorrect.
Fixes: 333fad5364d6: ("[IPV6]: Support several new sockopt / ancillary data in Advanced API (RFC3542)")
Signed-off-by: Craig Gallek <kraig@google.com>
---
net/ipv6/exthdrs.c | 13 +++++--------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/exthdrs.c b/net/ipv6/exthdrs.c
index 25192a3b0cd7..224a89e68a42 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/exthdrs.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/exthdrs.c
@@ -932,15 +932,12 @@ void ipv6_push_nfrag_opts(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ipv6_txoptions *opt,
u8 *proto,
struct in6_addr **daddr, struct in6_addr *saddr)
{
- if (opt->srcrt) {
+ if (opt->srcrt)
ipv6_push_rthdr(skb, proto, opt->srcrt, daddr, saddr);
- /*
- * IPV6_RTHDRDSTOPTS is ignored
- * unless IPV6_RTHDR is set (RFC3542).
- */
- if (opt->dst0opt)
- ipv6_push_exthdr(skb, proto, NEXTHDR_DEST, opt->dst0opt);
- }
+
+ if (opt->dst0opt)
+ ipv6_push_exthdr(skb, proto, NEXTHDR_DEST, opt->dst0opt);
+
if (opt->hopopt)
ipv6_push_exthdr(skb, proto, NEXTHDR_HOP, opt->hopopt);
}
--
2.13.0.rc0.306.g87b477812d-goog
next reply other threads:[~2017-04-26 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-26 17:07 Craig Gallek [this message]
2017-04-26 17:59 ` [PATCH net-next] ip6_tunnel: Fix missing tunnel encapsulation limit option Craig Gallek
2017-04-26 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 " Craig Gallek
2017-05-01 18:53 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170426170707.165201-1-kraigatgoog@gmail.com \
--to=kraigatgoog@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).