From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: ast@fb.com
Cc: daniel@iogearbox.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, xi.wang@gmail.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com
Subject: sparc64 and ARM64 JIT bug (was Re: LLVM 4.0 code generation bug)
Date: Mon, 01 May 2017 23:02:34 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170501.230234.787989809925411599.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e75404e5-c68d-6f08-afdc-e57174b88a32@fb.com>
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 19:39:33 -0700
> On 5/1/17 7:31 PM, David Miller wrote:
>>
>> If the last BPF instruction before exit is a ldimm64, branches to the
>> exit point at the wrong location.
>>
>> Here is what I get from test_pkt_access.c on sparc:
>>
>> 0000000000000000 <process>:
>> 0: b7 00 00 00 00 00 00 02 mov r0, 2
>> 8: 61 21 00 50 00 00 00 00 ldw r2, [r1+80]
>> 10: 61 11 00 4c 00 00 00 00 ldw r1, [r1+76]
>> 18: bf 41 00 00 00 00 00 00 mov r4, r1
>> 20: 07 40 00 00 00 00 00 0e add r4, 14
>> 28: 2d 42 00 25 00 00 00 00 jgt r4, r2, 148 <LBB0_11>
>> ...
>> 0000000000000148 <LBB0_11>:
>> 148: 18 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff ldimm64 r0, 4294967295
>> 150: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>>
>> 0000000000000158 <LBB0_12>:
>> 158: 95 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 exit
...
> looks fine to me. it jumps to 0x158,
> since offset 0 is the next insn after jump which is 0x30
> That's how classic bpf defined jumps.
Ok, it seems that both arm64 and sparc64's JIT handle the above
situation improperly.
They both work by recording the instruction offsets in an array which
is indexed off by one. It it built like this:
for (i = 0; i < prog->len; i++) {
const struct bpf_insn *insn = &prog->insnsi[i];
int ret;
ret = build_insn(insn, ctx);
ctx->offset[i] = ctx->idx;
if (ret > 0) {
i++;
continue;
}
if (ret)
return ret;
}
That is, we record the JIT'd instruction offset for BPF instruction
'idx' in array entry 'idx - 1'.
Then when we emit a relative branch, we lookup the destination offset
using "ctx->offset[this_insn_idx + insn->off]"
And this works most of the time. It doesn't work for the scenerio
above, because 'idx - 1' is not necessarily the index of the previous
BPF instruction. Instead, that might point to the second half of an
lddimm64 instruction.
This bug was introduced by commit
8eee539ddea09bccae2426f09b0ba6a18b72b691 ("arm64: bpf: fix
out-of-bounds read in bpf2a64_offset()") and I copied the logic into
sparc64 :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-02 3:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-02 2:31 LLVM 4.0 code generation bug David Miller
2017-05-02 2:39 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-05-02 2:41 ` David Miller
2017-05-02 3:02 ` David Miller [this message]
2017-05-02 3:19 ` sparc64 and ARM64 JIT bug David Miller
2017-05-02 14:11 ` sparc64 and ARM64 JIT bug (was Re: LLVM 4.0 code generation bug) Daniel Borkmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170501.230234.787989809925411599.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ast@fb.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xi.wang@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).