From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [RFC] iproute: Add support for extended ack to rtnl_talk Date: Thu, 04 May 2017 10:41:03 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20170504.104103.1628291573330660235.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20170503235638.31116-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <590AF624.6090808@iogearbox.net> <7315b681-9c78-4bc1-ab74-64509ab5887d@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: daniel@iogearbox.net, stephen@networkplumber.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: dsahern@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:55362 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752997AbdEDOlI (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 May 2017 10:41:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <7315b681-9c78-4bc1-ab74-64509ab5887d@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: David Ahern Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 08:27:35 -0600 > On 5/4/17 3:36 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote: >> What is the clear benefit/rationale of outsourcing this to >> libmnl? I always was the impression we should strive for as little >> dependencies as possible? > > +1 Agreed, all else being equal iproute2 should be as self contained as possible since it is such a fundamental tool.