From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [RFC] iproute: Add support for extended ack to rtnl_talk Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 09:43:56 -0700 Message-ID: <20170504094356.66590a9a@xeon-e3> References: <20170503235638.31116-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <590AF624.6090808@iogearbox.net> <7315b681-9c78-4bc1-ab74-64509ab5887d@gmail.com> <20170504.104103.1628291573330660235.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dsahern@gmail.com, daniel@iogearbox.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-pg0-f46.google.com ([74.125.83.46]:34403 "EHLO mail-pg0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753246AbdEDQn7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 May 2017 12:43:59 -0400 Received: by mail-pg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id v1so11371811pgv.1 for ; Thu, 04 May 2017 09:43:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20170504.104103.1628291573330660235.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 04 May 2017 10:41:03 -0400 (EDT) David Miller wrote: > From: David Ahern > Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 08:27:35 -0600 > > > On 5/4/17 3:36 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > >> What is the clear benefit/rationale of outsourcing this to > >> libmnl? I always was the impression we should strive for as little > >> dependencies as possible? > > > > +1 > > Agreed, all else being equal iproute2 should be as self contained > as possible since it is such a fundamental tool. Sorry, the old netlink code is more difficult to understand than libmnl. Having dependency on a library is not a problem. There already is an alternative implementation of ip commands in busybox for those people trying to work in small environments.