netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] iproute: Add support for extended ack to rtnl_talk
Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 09:45:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170504094558.78933e60@xeon-e3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170504143738.GY22833@mtr-leonro.local>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2452 bytes --]

On Thu, 4 May 2017 17:37:38 +0300
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 11:36:36AM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> > On 05/04/2017 01:56 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:  
> > > Add support for extended ack error reporting via libmnl. This
> > > is a better alternative to use existing library and not copy/paste
> > > code from the kernel. Also make arguments const where possible.
> > >
> > > Add a new function rtnl_talk_extack that takes a callback as an input
> > > arg. If a netlink response contains extack attributes, the callback is
> > > is invoked with the the err string, offset in the message and a pointer
> > > to the message returned by the kernel.
> > >
> > > Adding a new function allows commands to be moved over to the
> > > extended error reporting over time.
> > >
> > > For feedback, compile tested only.  
> >
> > Just out of curiosity, what is the plan regarding converting iproute2
> > over to libmnl (ip, tc, ss, ...)? In 2015, tipc tool was the first
> > user merged that requires libmnl, the only other user today in the
> > tree is devlink, which even seems to define its own libmnl library
> > helpers. What is the clear benefit/rationale of outsourcing this to
> > libmnl? I always was the impression we should strive for as little
> > dependencies as possible?  
> 
> And I would like to get direction for the RDMA tool [1] which I'm
> working on it now.
> 
> The overall decision was to use netlink and put it under iproute2
> umbrella. Currently, I have working RFC which is based on
> legacy sysfs interface to ensure that we are converging on
> user-experience even before moving to actual netlink defines.
> 
> An I would like to continue to work on netlink interface, but which lib interface
> should I need to base rdmatool's netlink code?
> 
> [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg148523.html
> 
> >
> > I don't really like that we make extended ack reporting now dependent
> > on libmnl, which further diverts from iproute's native nl library vs
> > requiring to install another nl library, making the current status
> > quo even worse ... :/
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Daniel  

I would prefer new code use libmnl, but using libnetlink would also be ok.
Any later conversion to libmnl would be mostly automated anyway.

The real objection was copy/pasting in the kernel netlink parser.
That was unnecessary bloat.

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-04 16:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-03 23:56 [RFC] iproute: Add support for extended ack to rtnl_talk Stephen Hemminger
2017-05-04  9:36 ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-05-04 14:27   ` David Ahern
2017-05-04 14:41     ` David Miller
2017-05-04 15:50       ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-05-04 16:43       ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-05-04 20:43         ` Phil Sutter
2017-05-14  1:29           ` David Ahern
2017-05-16 16:36             ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-05-18 10:02               ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-05-18 14:55                 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-05-19  4:24                 ` David Ahern
2017-08-03 20:26                   ` David Ahern
2017-08-04 11:31                     ` Simon Horman
2017-08-04 16:47                       ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-08-07 16:48                         ` David Ahern
2017-08-07 18:06                           ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-08-07 18:09                             ` David Ahern
2017-08-07 18:45                               ` David Miller
2017-08-07 19:12                                 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-08-07 20:26                                   ` David Miller
2017-08-07 21:21                                     ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-05-04 14:37   ` Leon Romanovsky
2017-05-04 16:45     ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2017-05-04 17:55       ` Leon Romanovsky
2017-05-06 10:36         ` Jiri Pirko
2017-05-04 16:42   ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170504094558.78933e60@xeon-e3 \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).