From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: elfring@users.sourceforge.net
Cc: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
javier@osg.samsung.com, jpr@f6fbb.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] hamradio: Fine-tuning for nine function implementations
Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 10:43:51 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170509.104351.172861857537994111.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4c5c939a-bd55-7b88-8e41-49f5544b7658@users.sourceforge.net>
You can feel free to continue submitting these changes, even though
people have asked you to back off on this, and that there is little to
no value to this churn.
But I personally am not going to apply any of your changes...
Especially since you keep posting even though people are asking you to
not make these changes.
You can ignore feedback like that, and you are explicitly being
notified that as a result, we can feel free to ignore you _too_.
People who submit kernel changes in the way you do waste a lot of
people's valuable time which could be spent on fixing real bugs,
implementing new important features, adding new documentation to
improve the understanding of the kernel for everyone, etc.
But instead, that time is being invested to reviewing your extremely
low value patches, many of which are undesirable.
I will not stand for it as the networking maintainer and am going to
ignore everything you submit until your approach and attitude towards
kernel patch submission _fundamentally_ (not temporarily, or for one
specific set of patches) changes.
Thank you.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-09 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-09 14:21 [PATCH 0/4] hamradio: Fine-tuning for nine function implementations SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-09 14:22 ` [PATCH 1/4] hamradio: Combine two seq_printf() calls into one in yam_seq_show() SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-10 8:48 ` David Laight
2017-05-09 14:23 ` [PATCH 2/4] hamradio: Adjust four function calls together with a variable assignment SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-09 14:24 ` [PATCH 3/4] hamradio: Use seq_puts() in bpq_seq_show() SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-09 14:25 ` [PATCH 4/4] hamradio: Adjust four function calls together with a variable assignment SF Markus Elfring
2017-05-09 14:43 ` David Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170509.104351.172861857537994111.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=elfring@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=javier@osg.samsung.com \
--cc=jpr@f6fbb.org \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hams@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).