From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: arch: arm: bpf: Converting cBPF to eBPF for arm 32 bit Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 16:19:41 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20170509.161941.675253656642957586.davem@davemloft.net> References: <58E639E0.1010700@iogearbox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: daniel@iogearbox.net, keescook@chromium.org, mgherzan@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, ast@fb.com To: illusionist.neo@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:32992 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753313AbdEIUTo (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 May 2017 16:19:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Shubham Bansal Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 01:42:10 +0530 > Why is trying to execute TAX which is a cBPF instruction? Because some of the tests are classic BPF programs which get translated into eBPF ones and sent to the JIT for compilation.