From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
To: Ivan Vecera <cera@cera.cz>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
sashok@cumulusnetworks.com, stephen@networkplumber.org,
bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, lucien.xin@gmail.com,
nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] bridge: fix hello and hold timers starting/stopping
Date: Sat, 20 May 2017 13:57:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170520055720.GA12974@leo.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170519173043.10201-1-cera@cera.cz>
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 07:30:43PM +0200, Ivan Vecera wrote:
> Current bridge code incorrectly handles starting/stopping of hello and
> hold timers during STP enable/disable.
>
> 1. Timers are stopped in br_stp_start() during NO_STP->USER_STP
> transition. The timers are already stopped in NO_STP state so
> this is confusing no-op.
Hi Ivan,
Shouldn't we start hello timer in br_stp_start when NO_STP -> BR_KERNEL_STP ?
>
> 2. During USER_STP->NO_STP transition the timers are started. This
> does not make sense and is confusion because the timer should not be
> active in NO_STP state.
Yes, but what about BR_KERNEL_STP -> NO_STP in function br_stp_stop() ?
>
> Cc: davem@davemloft.net
> Cc: sashok@cumulusnetworks.com
> Cc: stephen@networkplumber.org
> Cc: bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org
> Cc: lucien.xin@gmail.com
> Cc: nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <cera@cera.cz>
> ---
> net/bridge/br_stp_if.c | 11 -----------
> 1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c b/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
> index 08341d2aa9c9..a05027027513 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
> @@ -150,7 +150,6 @@ static int br_stp_call_user(struct net_bridge *br, char *arg)
>
> static void br_stp_start(struct net_bridge *br)
> {
> - struct net_bridge_port *p;
> int err = -ENOENT;
>
> if (net_eq(dev_net(br->dev), &init_net))
> @@ -169,11 +168,6 @@ static void br_stp_start(struct net_bridge *br)
> if (!err) {
> br->stp_enabled = BR_USER_STP;
> br_debug(br, "userspace STP started\n");
> -
> - /* Stop hello and hold timers */
> - del_timer(&br->hello_timer);
> - list_for_each_entry(p, &br->port_list, list)
> - del_timer(&p->hold_timer);
I'm not sure if user space daemon will send bpdu or not? In comment
76b91c32dd86 ("bridge: stp: when using userspace stp stop kernel hello and
hold timers"). Nikolay said we should not handle it with BR_USER_STP.
> } else {
> br->stp_enabled = BR_KERNEL_STP;
> br_debug(br, "using kernel STP\n");
> @@ -187,7 +181,6 @@ static void br_stp_start(struct net_bridge *br)
>
> static void br_stp_stop(struct net_bridge *br)
> {
> - struct net_bridge_port *p;
> int err;
>
> if (br->stp_enabled == BR_USER_STP) {
> @@ -196,10 +189,6 @@ static void br_stp_stop(struct net_bridge *br)
> br_err(br, "failed to stop userspace STP (%d)\n", err);
>
> /* To start timers on any ports left in blocking */
> - mod_timer(&br->hello_timer, jiffies + br->hello_time);
> - list_for_each_entry(p, &br->port_list, list)
> - mod_timer(&p->hold_timer,
> - round_jiffies(jiffies + BR_HOLD_TIME));
If we do not del hello_timer. after it expired in br_hello_timer_expired(),
Our state is br->dev->flags & IFF_UP and br->stp_enabled == NO_STP, it will
call mod_timer(&br->hello_timer, round_jiffies(jiffies + br->hello_time))
and we will keep sending bpdu message even after stp stoped.
> spin_lock_bh(&br->lock);
> br_port_state_selection(br);
> spin_unlock_bh(&br->lock);
> --
So how about just like
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c b/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
index d8ad73b..0198f62 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
@@ -183,6 +183,7 @@ static void br_stp_start(struct net_bridge *br)
} else {
br->stp_enabled = BR_KERNEL_STP;
br_debug(br, "using kernel STP\n");
+ mod_timer(&br->hello_timer, jiffies + br->hello_time);
/* To start timers on any ports left in blocking */
br_port_state_selection(br);
@@ -202,7 +203,6 @@ static void br_stp_stop(struct net_bridge *br)
br_err(br, "failed to stop userspace STP (%d)\n", err);
/* To start timers on any ports left in blocking */
- mod_timer(&br->hello_timer, jiffies + br->hello_time);
list_for_each_entry(p, &br->port_list, list)
mod_timer(&p->hold_timer,
round_jiffies(jiffies + BR_HOLD_TIME));
@@ -211,6 +211,7 @@ static void br_stp_stop(struct net_bridge *br)
spin_unlock_bh(&br->lock);
}
+ del_timer_sync(&br->hello_timer);
br->stp_enabled = BR_NO_STP;
}
Thanks
Hangbin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-20 5:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-19 17:30 [PATCH net-next v2] bridge: fix hello and hold timers starting/stopping Ivan Vecera
2017-05-19 17:35 ` Xin Long
2017-05-19 20:12 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2017-05-20 5:57 ` Hangbin Liu [this message]
2017-05-20 6:55 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2017-05-20 7:06 ` Ivan Vecera
2017-05-20 7:47 ` Hangbin Liu
2017-05-22 18:41 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170520055720.GA12974@leo.usersys.redhat.com \
--to=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cera@cera.cz \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=sashok@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).