From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Subject: Re: New Coverity defect in BPF verifier
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 10:26:43 -0700
Message-ID: <20170522102643.35a02b7d@xeon-e3>
References: <20170522090512.38dbcefa@xeon-e3>
        <20170522.121604.2157216252893063658.davem@davemloft.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-pf0-f173.google.com ([209.85.192.173]:35490 "EHLO
        mail-pf0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1759684AbdEVR0u (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 22 May 2017 13:26:50 -0400
Received: by mail-pf0-f173.google.com with SMTP id n23so88519318pfb.2
        for <netdev@vger.kernel.org>; Mon, 22 May 2017 10:26:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20170522.121604.2157216252893063658.davem@davemloft.net>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, 22 May 2017 12:16:04 -0400 (EDT)
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:

> Stephen, if you had even lightly scanned netdev today, you can see
> that we are discussing this already and there are at least two
> patches proposed.
> 
> Thank you.

Sorry hadn't gotten that far. Doing full scan of 100's of messages
a day is not always possible.