public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
	David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>,
	Simon Horman <simon.horman@netronome.com>,
	mlxsw@mellanox.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next RFC] net: sched: cls_api: make reclassify return all the way back to the original tp
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 07:15:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170523051502.GA1829@nanopsycho> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM_iQpUUfrCvaLUeEOyzCYg9_9sZ3URZeVaP13R7OTX9tLOQuQ@mail.gmail.com>

Tue, May 23, 2017 at 01:57:47AM CEST, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com wrote:
>On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> wrote:
>> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
>>
>> With the introduction of chain goto action, the reclassification would
>> cause the re-iteration of the actual chain. But it perhaps makes more
>> sense to restart the whole thing. Thoughts?
>
>I think reclassification is meant to restart the whole logic rather
>than just one chain. So your patch makes sense to me, but not
>sure if there is any corner case I miss.

Agreed. Will send v1. Thanks

      reply	other threads:[~2017-05-23  5:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-22 15:09 [patch net-next RFC] net: sched: cls_api: make reclassify return all the way back to the original tp Jiri Pirko
2017-05-22 23:57 ` Cong Wang
2017-05-23  5:15   ` Jiri Pirko [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170523051502.GA1829@nanopsycho \
    --to=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsa@cumulusnetworks.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=mlxsw@mellanox.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=simon.horman@netronome.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox