From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] test_bpf: Add a couple of tests for BPF_JSGE. Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 14:39:22 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20170525.143922.468217376527455487.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20170524233549.18388-1-david.daney@cavium.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: david.daney@cavium.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:60426 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757316AbdEYSj0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 May 2017 14:39:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20170524233549.18388-1-david.daney@cavium.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: David Daney Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 16:35:49 -0700 > Some JITs can optimize comparisons with zero. Add a couple of > BPF_JSGE tests against immediate zero. > > Signed-off-by: David Daney Applied, thank you. This reminds me that I should add support for "branch on register" to the sparc64 eBPF JIT. At least now, when I do so, there will be tests for it :-)