netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: colin.king@canonical.com
Cc: peppe.cavallaro@st.com, alexandre.torgue@st.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: stmmac: ensure jumbo_frm error return is correctly checked for -ve value
Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2017 19:58:15 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170604.195815.1578427347580474114.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170602145827.21151-1-colin.king@canonical.com>

From: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Date: Fri,  2 Jun 2017 15:58:27 +0100

> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> 
> The current comparison of entry < 0 will never be true since entry is an
> unsigned integer. Cast entry to an int to ensure -ve error return values
> from the call to jumbo_frm are correctly being caught.
> 
> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1238760 ("Macro compares unsigned to 0")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

Like others have suggested, probably making 'entry' signed is
a better fix.

I was initially worried that STMMAC_GET_ENTRY() might become
more expensive if it was implemented using '%' but it is using
'and' masking instead which doesn't have that kind of problem.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2017-06-04 23:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-02 14:58 [PATCH] net: stmmac: ensure jumbo_frm error return is correctly checked for -ve value Colin King
2017-06-03 15:55 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-06-03 16:35   ` Colin Ian King
2017-06-03 16:53     ` Julia Lawall
2017-06-03 17:18     ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-06-04 23:58 ` David Miller [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170604.195815.1578427347580474114.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
    --cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peppe.cavallaro@st.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).