From: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
gregory.clement@free-electrons.com, mw@semihalf.com,
linux@armlinux.org.uk, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: mvpp2: do not bypass the mvpp22_port_mii_set function
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 15:51:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170606135148.GA22618@kwain.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170606154535.3e87bafb@free-electrons.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1055 bytes --]
Hello Thomas,
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 03:45:35PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 15:36:15 +0200, Antoine Tenart wrote:
> > The mvpp22_port_mii_set() function was added by 2697582144dd, but the
> > function directly returns without doing anything. This return was used
> > when debugging and wasn't removed before sending the patch. Fix this.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com>
>
> Please add:
>
> Fixes: 2697582144dd ("net: mvpp2: handle misc PPv2.1/PPv2.2 differences")
>
> with this:
>
> Acked-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
OK, will do.
> I am wondering if we shouldn't Cc: stable as well. I don't think we
> have seen issues on our side because U-Boot does the necessary
> initialization, but people using other bootloaders might have issues.
Yes, that might be safer to cc stable. I'll do this as well.
Thanks,
Antoine
--
Antoine Ténart, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-06 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-06 13:36 [PATCH] net: mvpp2: do not bypass the mvpp22_port_mii_set function Antoine Tenart
2017-06-06 13:45 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-06-06 13:51 ` Antoine Tenart [this message]
2017-06-06 14:24 ` Florian Fainelli
2017-06-06 14:38 ` Antoine Tenart
2017-06-06 15:44 ` Sergei Shtylyov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170606135148.GA22618@kwain.lan \
--to=antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mw@semihalf.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).