From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
simon.horman@netronome.com, mrv@mojatatu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v10 1/4] net netlink: Add new type NLA_FLAG_BITS
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 12:34:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170612103432.GA1993@nanopsycho> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4441aa62-d00e-82b6-d337-f86cf97e3c6d@mojatatu.com>
Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 08:37:25PM CEST, jhs@mojatatu.com wrote:
>On 17-06-11 01:38 PM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
>> On 17-06-11 09:49 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> > Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 01:53:43PM CEST, jhs@mojatatu.com wrote:
>> > > From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
>>
>>
>> > > This patch also provides an extra feature: a validation callback
>> > > that could be speaciliazed for other types.
>> >
>> > s/speaciliazed/speciliazed/
>> >
>>
>> Will fix.
>>
>>
>> > >
>> > > [ATTR_GOO] = { .type = MYTYPE,
>> > > .validation_data = &myvalidation_data,
>> > > .validate_content = mycontent_validator },
>> >
>> > Indent is wrong. (Does not matter really in desc, but anyway)
>> >
>>
>> I cant find out how it got indented that way; my source
>> or email dont show it as such (but really doesnt matter).
>>
>>
>> > Suggested-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
>> >
>>
>> Will add.
>>
>> >
>> > > ---
>> > > include/net/netlink.h | 11 +++++++++++
>> > > include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>> > > lib/nlattr.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> > > 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+)
>> > >
>> > > diff --git a/include/net/netlink.h b/include/net/netlink.h
>> > > index 0170917..8ab9784 100644
>> > > --- a/include/net/netlink.h
>> > > +++ b/include/net/netlink.h
>> > > @@ -6,6 +6,11 @@
>> > > #include <linux/jiffies.h>
>> > > #include <linux/in6.h>
>> > >
>> > > +struct nla_bit_flags {
>> > > + u32 nla_flag_values;
>> > > + u32 nla_flag_selector;
>> > > +};
>> >
>> > I don't understand why you redefine the struct here. You already have it
>> > defined in the uapi: struct __nla_bit_flags
>> >
>> > Just move this (struct nla_bit_flags) to the uapi and remove
>> > __nla_bit_flags ?
>> >
>>
>> I am not sure that will compile since the type is defined in netlink.h
>> Also, note: uapi uses _u32 and kernel uses u32 as types i.e it is pretty
>> common approach; i will try to move it to uapi and keep that uapi
>> format. If it doesnt compile without acrobatics I will keep it as is.
>>
>
>It doesnt compile - I could move it to linux/netlink.h but it seems
>so out of place.
>so i will keep things as is for now unless you can think of something
>else.
First of all, makes no sense to put this struct "struct __nla_bit_flags"
into rtnetlink.h uapi file. This is generic netlink stuff, not specifict
to rtnetlink.
I believe that this struct should go into:
include/uapi/linux/netlink.h
struct nla_flag_bits {
__u32 nla_flag_bits_values;
__u32 nla_flag_bits_selector;
};
Then you can use it from userspace and everywhere in kernel.
Btw, I find it very odd that enum containling NLA_* like NLA_U32 and
others is not part of uapi file and is rather defined in
include/net/netlink.h. Any idea why?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-12 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-11 11:53 [PATCH net-next v10 0/4] net sched actions: improve dump performance Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-06-11 11:53 ` [PATCH net-next v10 1/4] net netlink: Add new type NLA_FLAG_BITS Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-06-11 13:49 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-06-11 17:38 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-06-11 18:37 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-06-12 10:34 ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
2017-06-12 11:10 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-06-12 11:43 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-06-12 13:51 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-06-12 14:14 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-06-12 15:00 ` David Ahern
2017-06-12 19:22 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-06-12 19:58 ` David Ahern
2017-06-13 5:32 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-06-13 10:53 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-06-13 11:25 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-06-13 13:58 ` David Ahern
2017-06-11 11:53 ` [PATCH net-next v10 2/4] net sched actions: Use proper root attribute table for actions Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-06-11 13:55 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-06-11 11:53 ` [PATCH net-next v10 3/4] net sched actions: dump more than TCA_ACT_MAX_PRIO actions per batch Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-06-11 14:13 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-06-11 17:45 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-06-12 11:16 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-06-12 11:47 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-06-12 13:57 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-06-12 14:16 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-06-11 11:53 ` [PATCH net-next v10 4/4] net sched actions: add time filter for action dumping Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-06-11 12:06 ` [PATCH net-next v10 0/4] net sched actions: improve dump performance Jamal Hadi Salim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170612103432.GA1993@nanopsycho \
--to=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=mrv@mojatatu.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=simon.horman@netronome.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).