Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: brouer@redhat.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, fweimer@redhat.com, hjl.tools@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: don't global ICMP rate limit packets originating from loopback
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 15:34:27 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170614.153427.2166855120464478061.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <149743965710.19877.13901728209731997446.stgit@firesoul>

From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 13:27:37 +0200

> Florian Weimer seems to have a glibc test-case which requires that
> loopback interfaces does not get ICMP ratelimited.  This was broken by
> commit c0303efeab73 ("net: reduce cycles spend on ICMP replies that
> gets rate limited").
> 
> An ICMP response will usually be routed back-out the same incoming
> interface.  Thus, take advantage of this and skip global ICMP
> ratelimit when the incoming device is loopback.  In the unlikely event
> that the outgoing it not loopback, due to strange routing policy
> rules, ICMP rate limiting still works via peer ratelimiting via
> icmpv4_xrlim_allow().  Thus, we should still comply with RFC1812
> (section 4.3.2.8 "Rate Limiting").
> 
> This seems to fix the reproducer given by Florian.  While still
> avoiding to perform expensive and unneeded outgoing route lookup for
> rate limited packets (in the non-loopback case).
> 
> Fixes: c0303efeab73 ("net: reduce cycles spend on ICMP replies that gets rate limited")
> Reported-by: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
> Reported-by: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>

Applied and queued up for -stable, thanks Jesper.

      reply	other threads:[~2017-06-14 19:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-14 11:27 [PATCH net] net: don't global ICMP rate limit packets originating from loopback Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-06-14 19:34 ` David Miller [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170614.153427.2166855120464478061.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox