From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: tracywwnj@gmail.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, kafai@fb.com,
weiwan@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/21] remove dst garbage collector logic
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 15:07:11 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170616.150711.596195466309167124.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170616174744.139688-1-tracywwnj@gmail.com>
From: Wei Wang <tracywwnj@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 10:47:23 -0700
> From: Wei Wang <weiwan@google.com>
>
> The current mechanism of dst release is a bit complicated. It is because
> the users of dst get divided into 2 situations:
> 1. Most users take the reference count when using a dst and release the
> reference count when done.
> 2. Exceptional users like IPv4/IPv6/decnet/xfrm routing code do not take
> reference count when referencing to a dst due to some histotic reasons.
>
> Due to those exceptional use cases in 2, reference count being 0 is not an
> adequate evidence to indicate that no user is using this dst. So users in 1
> can't free the dst simply based on reference count being 0 because users in
> 2 might still hold reference to it.
> Instead, a dst garbage list is needed to hold the dst entries that already
> get removed by the users in 2 but are still held by users in 1. And a periodic
> garbage collector task is run to check all the dst entries in the list to see
> if the users in 1 have released the reference to those dst entries.
> If so, the dst is now ready to be freed.
>
> This logic introduces unnecessary complications in the dst code which makes it
> hard to understand and to debug.
>
> In order to get rid of the whole dst garbage collector (gc) and make the dst
> code more unified and simplified, we can make the users in 2 also take reference
> count on the dst and release it properly when done.
> This way, dst can be safely freed once the refcount drops to 0 and no gc
> thread is needed anymore.
>
> This patch series' target is to completely get rid of dst gc logic and free
> dst based on reference count only.
> Patch 1-3 are preparation patches to do some cleanup/improvement on the existing
> code to make later work easier.
> Patch 4-21 are real implementations.
> In these patches, a temporary flag DST_NOGC is used to help transition
> those exceptional users one by one. Once every component is transitioned,
> this temporary flag is removed.
> By the end of this patch series, all dst are refcounted when being used
> and released when done. And dst will be freed when its refcount drops to 0.
> No dst gc task is running anymore.
>
> Note: This patch series depends on the decnet fix that was sent right before:
> "decnet: always not take dst->__refcnt when inserting dst into hash table"
Other than the minor feedback I gave, this series looks great!
Indeed the code is a lot simpler afterwards and much easier to audit and
understand.
I'll wait a bit for some others to give feedback as well.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-16 19:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-16 17:47 [PATCH net-next 00/21] remove dst garbage collector logic Wei Wang
2017-06-16 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 01/21] ipv6: remove unnecessary dst_hold() in ip6_fragment() Wei Wang
2017-06-16 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 02/21] udp: call dst_hold_safe() in udp_sk_rx_set_dst() Wei Wang
2017-06-16 19:02 ` David Miller
2017-06-16 19:06 ` Wei Wang
2017-06-16 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 03/21] net: use loopback dev when generating blackhole route Wei Wang
2017-06-16 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 04/21] net: introduce DST_NOGC in dst_release() to destroy dst based on refcnt Wei Wang
2017-06-16 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 05/21] net: introduce a new function dst_dev_put() Wei Wang
2017-06-16 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 06/21] ipv4: take dst->__refcnt when caching dst in fib Wei Wang
2017-06-16 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 07/21] ipv4: call dst_dev_put() properly Wei Wang
2017-06-16 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 08/21] ipv4: call dst_hold_safe() properly Wei Wang
2017-06-16 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 09/21] ipv4: mark DST_NOGC and remove the operation of dst_free() Wei Wang
2017-06-16 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 10/21] ipv6: take dst->__refcnt for insertion into fib6 tree Wei Wang
2017-06-16 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 11/21] ipv6: call dst_dev_put() properly Wei Wang
2017-06-17 14:14 ` kbuild test robot
2017-06-16 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 12/21] ipv6: call dst_hold_safe() properly Wei Wang
2017-06-16 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 13/21] ipv6: mark DST_NOGC and remove the operation of dst_free() Wei Wang
2017-06-16 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 14/21] ipv6: get rid of icmp6 dst garbage collector Wei Wang
2017-06-16 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 15/21] xfrm: take refcnt of dst when creating struct xfrm_dst bundle Wei Wang
2017-06-16 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 16/21] decnet: take dst->__refcnt when struct dn_route is created Wei Wang
2017-06-17 16:21 ` kbuild test robot
2017-06-16 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 17/21] net: remove dst gc related code Wei Wang
2017-06-16 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 18/21] net: remove DST_NOGC flag Wei Wang
2017-06-16 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 19/21] net: remove DST_NOCACHE flag Wei Wang
2017-06-16 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 20/21] net: reorder all the dst flags Wei Wang
2017-06-16 17:47 ` [PATCH net-next 21/21] net: add debug atomic_inc_not_zero() in dst_hold() Wei Wang
2017-06-16 19:07 ` David Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170616.150711.596195466309167124.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tracywwnj@gmail.com \
--cc=weiwan@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).