From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: serhe.popovych@gmail.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] veth: Be more robust on network device creation when no attributes
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 12:40:59 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170620.124059.822096659295374001.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1497625500-19440-1-git-send-email-serhe.popovych@gmail.com>
From: Serhey Popovych <serhe.popovych@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 18:05:00 +0300
> There are number of problems with configuration peer
> network device in absence of IFLA_VETH_PEER attributes
> where attributes for main network device shared with
> peer.
>
> First it is not feasible to configure both network
> devices with same MAC address since this makes
> communication in such configuration problematic.
>
> This case can be reproduced with following sequence:
>
> # ip link add address 02:11:22:33:44:55 type veth
> # ip li sh
> ...
> 26: veth0@veth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,M-DOWN> mtu 1500 qdisc \
> noop state DOWN mode DEFAULT qlen 1000
> link/ether 00:11:22:33:44:55 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> 27: veth1@veth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,M-DOWN> mtu 1500 qdisc \
> noop state DOWN mode DEFAULT qlen 1000
> link/ether 00:11:22:33:44:55 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>
> Second it is not possible to register main network device
> with given name and automatically create peer network
> device name. That happens because IFLA_IFNAME used when
> creating main and reused when creating peer.
>
> This case can be reproduced with following sequence:
>
> # ip link add dev veth1a type veth
> RTNETLINK answers: File exists
>
> To fix both of the cases check if corresponding netlink
> attributes are taken from peer_tb when valid or
> name based on rtnl ops kind and random address is used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Serhey Popovych <serhe.popovych@gmail.com>
This does not apply cleanly to the 'net' tree, please respin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-20 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-16 15:05 [PATCH] veth: Be more robust on network device creation when no attributes Serhey Popovych
2017-06-20 16:40 ` David Miller [this message]
2017-06-21 9:02 ` Serhey Popovych
2017-06-21 9:12 ` Serhey Popovych
2017-06-22 15:16 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170620.124059.822096659295374001.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serhe.popovych@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).