From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
To: Mateusz Jurczyk <mjurczyk@google.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, security@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfc: Fix the sockaddr length sanitization in llcp_sock_connect
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 00:27:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170622222717.GE21214@zurbaran.ger.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170524102620.13806-1-mjurczyk@google.com>
Hi Mateusz,
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:26:20PM +0200, Mateusz Jurczyk wrote:
> Fix the sockaddr length verification in the connect() handler of NFC/LLCP
> sockets, to compare against the size of the actual structure expected on
> input (sockaddr_nfc_llcp) instead of its shorter version (sockaddr_nfc).
>
> Both structures are defined in include/uapi/linux/nfc.h. The fields
> specific to the _llcp extended struct are as follows:
>
> 276 __u8 dsap; /* Destination SAP, if known */
> 277 __u8 ssap; /* Source SAP to be bound to */
> 278 char service_name[NFC_LLCP_MAX_SERVICE_NAME]; /* Service name URI */;
> 279 size_t service_name_len;
>
> If the caller doesn't provide a sufficiently long sockaddr buffer, these
> fields remain uninitialized (and they currently originate from the stack
> frame of the top-level sys_connect handler). They are then copied by
> llcp_sock_connect() into internal storage (nfc_llcp_sock structure), and
> could be subsequently read back through the user-mode getsockname()
> function (handled by llcp_sock_getname()). This would result in the
> disclosure of up to ~70 uninitialized bytes from the kernel stack to
> user-mode clients capable of creating AFC_NFC sockets.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mateusz Jurczyk <mjurczyk@google.com>
> ---
> net/nfc/llcp_sock.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
Applied to nfc-next, thanks.
Cheers,
Samuel.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-22 22:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-24 10:26 [PATCH] nfc: Fix the sockaddr length sanitization in llcp_sock_connect Mateusz Jurczyk
[not found] ` <20170524102620.13806-1-mjurczyk-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2017-05-24 16:58 ` Kees Cook
2017-06-22 22:27 ` Samuel Ortiz [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170622222717.GE21214@zurbaran.ger.intel.com \
--to=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjurczyk@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).