From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@ti.com>
Cc: linux-can@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
wg@grandegger.com, mkl@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: CAN-FD Transceiver Limitations
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 17:41:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170629154139.GC13221@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5d4f2bcf-bd0f-4fa1-5d5a-d7b4a83cbc5e@ti.com>
> Transceivers for CAN are not apart of any model. Traditional CAN didn't
> have a problem because all transceivers from my understanding supported
> the maximum speed of 1 Mbps defined by the spec. However, with the
> introduction of CAN Flexible Datarate mode it seems that for
> transceivers that supported CAN-FD the maximum supported speeds vary.
So transceivers are dumb devices, nothing to configure, so no need to
have a driver for them.
> Now that I think of it
> you also can't determine if the transceiver supports CAN-FD in the first
> place. IP that supports CAN-FD is backwards compatible with standard
> CAN. Therefore, its feasible that you may even use a transceiver that
> doesn't support CAN-FD. So I would think something like the below would
> be needed.
>
> mcan@0 {
> ...
> fixed-transceiver {
> max-canfd-speed = <2000>
> };
> ...
> };
Are there likely to be other transceiver properties? Adding a subnode
may not make sense if this is going to be the only property.
Also, 2KHz is not very fast :-)
Taking a quick look in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can, it
seems a bit of a wild west. No standardization, no central binding
which CAN drivers are expected to support, etc. This sounds like a
generic problem, not an mcan problem. So document this property
centrally, implement the parsing of it centrally, etc, to encourage
other CAN drivers to use it, rather than re-invent the wheel.
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-29 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-28 22:14 CAN-FD Transceiver Limitations Franklin S Cooper Jr
2017-06-29 14:21 ` Andrew Lunn
2017-06-29 14:49 ` Franklin S Cooper Jr
2017-06-29 15:41 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2017-06-29 16:36 ` Franklin S Cooper Jr
2017-06-29 17:19 ` Andrew Lunn
2017-06-29 22:36 ` Kurt Van Dijck
[not found] ` <20170629223551.GA6568-W3bwb+3xS1LIj2mJfgo99rBP9FGTfoIhIWnq8iejnXE@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-29 23:14 ` Franklin S Cooper Jr
[not found] ` <d5c2e2f2-8b74-58e1-0cc8-727ba39bd14c-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-30 8:09 ` Kurt Van Dijck
[not found] ` <20170630080906.GA26712-W3bwb+3xS1LIj2mJfgo99rBP9FGTfoIhIWnq8iejnXE@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-30 17:51 ` Franklin S Cooper Jr
2017-07-10 14:58 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170629154139.GC13221@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=fcooper@ti.com \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wg@grandegger.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).