netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Andreas Steinmetz <ast@domdv.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sctp: Add peeloff-flags socket option
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 16:04:05 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170629190405.GL18138@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170629181340.12423-1-nhorman@tuxdriver.com>

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 02:13:40PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> Based on a request raised on the sctp devel list, there is a need to
> augment the sctp_peeloff operation while specifying the O_CLOEXEC and
> O_NONBLOCK flags (simmilar to the socket syscall).  Since modifying the
> SCTP_SOCKOPT_PEELOFF socket option would break user space ABI for existing
> programs, this patch creates a new socket option
> SCTP_SOCKOPT_PEELOFF_FLAGS, which accepts a third flags parameter to
> allow atomic assignment of the socket descriptor flags.
> 
> Tested successfully by myself and the requestor
> 
> Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
> CC: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> CC: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
> CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
> CC: Andreas Steinmetz <ast@domdv.de>
> CC: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
> ---
>  fs/file.c                 |  1 +
>  include/uapi/linux/sctp.h |  6 ++++
>  net/sctp/socket.c         | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  3 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/file.c b/fs/file.c
> index 1c2972e..a4521da 100644
> --- a/fs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/file.c
> @@ -807,6 +807,7 @@ void set_close_on_exec(unsigned int fd, int flag)
>  		__clear_close_on_exec(fd, fdt);
>  	spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(set_close_on_exec);
>  
>  bool get_close_on_exec(unsigned int fd)
>  {
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/sctp.h b/include/uapi/linux/sctp.h
> index ced9d8b..6217ff8 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/sctp.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/sctp.h
> @@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ typedef __s32 sctp_assoc_t;
>  #define SCTP_RESET_STREAMS	119
>  #define SCTP_RESET_ASSOC	120
>  #define SCTP_ADD_STREAMS	121
> +#define SCTP_SOCKOPT_PEELOFF_FLAGS 122
>  
>  /* PR-SCTP policies */
>  #define SCTP_PR_SCTP_NONE	0x0000
> @@ -978,6 +979,11 @@ typedef struct {
>  	int sd;
>  } sctp_peeloff_arg_t;
>  
> +typedef struct {
> +	sctp_peeloff_arg_t p_arg;
> +	unsigned flags;
> +} sctp_peeloff_flags_arg_t;
> +
>  /*
>   *  Peer Address Thresholds socket option
>   */
> diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
> index 7b6e20e..7341053 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/socket.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
> @@ -4933,20 +4933,12 @@ int sctp_do_peeloff(struct sock *sk, sctp_assoc_t id, struct socket **sockp)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(sctp_do_peeloff);
>  
> -static int sctp_getsockopt_peeloff(struct sock *sk, int len, char __user *optval, int __user *optlen)
> +static int sctp_getsockopt_peeloff_common(struct sock *sk, sctp_peeloff_arg_t *peeloff, struct file **newfile, unsigned flags)
>  {
> -	sctp_peeloff_arg_t peeloff;
>  	struct socket *newsock;
> -	struct file *newfile;
>  	int retval = 0;
                   ^^^ this initialization is not needed anymore
as the line after it is always assigning it.

>  
> -	if (len < sizeof(sctp_peeloff_arg_t))
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -	len = sizeof(sctp_peeloff_arg_t);
> -	if (copy_from_user(&peeloff, optval, len))
> -		return -EFAULT;
> -
> -	retval = sctp_do_peeloff(sk, peeloff.associd, &newsock);
> +	retval = sctp_do_peeloff(sk, peeloff->associd, &newsock);
>  	if (retval < 0)
>  		goto out;
>  
> @@ -4957,25 +4949,90 @@ static int sctp_getsockopt_peeloff(struct sock *sk, int len, char __user *optval
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> -	newfile = sock_alloc_file(newsock, 0, NULL);
> -	if (IS_ERR(newfile)) {
> +	*newfile = sock_alloc_file(newsock, 0, NULL);
> +	if (IS_ERR(*newfile)) {
>  		put_unused_fd(retval);
>  		sock_release(newsock);
> -		return PTR_ERR(newfile);
> +		retval = PTR_ERR(*newfile);
> +		*newfile = NULL;
> +		return retval;
>  	}
>  
>  	pr_debug("%s: sk:%p, newsk:%p, sd:%d\n", __func__, sk, newsock->sk,
>  		 retval);
> +	
> +	peeloff->sd = retval;
> +
> +	set_close_on_exec(peeloff->sd, !!(flags & SOCK_CLOEXEC));

You can avoid this call (and the export) if you pass flags &
SOCK_CLOEXEC to get_unused_fd_flags(), which currently uses flags=0.

> +
> +	if (flags & SOCK_NONBLOCK)
> +		(*newfile)->f_flags |= O_NONBLOCK;

and also to sock_alloc_file().

> +out:
> +	return retval;
> +}
> +
> +static int sctp_getsockopt_peeloff(struct sock *sk, int len, char __user *optval, int __user *optlen)
> +{
> +	sctp_peeloff_arg_t peeloff;
> +	struct file *newfile = NULL;
> +	int retval = 0;
> +
> +	if (len < sizeof(sctp_peeloff_arg_t))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	len = sizeof(sctp_peeloff_arg_t);
> +	if (copy_from_user(&peeloff, optval, len))
> +		return -EFAULT;
> +
> +	retval = sctp_getsockopt_peeloff_common(sk, &peeloff, &newfile, 0);
> +	if (retval < 0)
        ^^

> +		goto out;
>  
>  	/* Return the fd mapped to the new socket.  */
>  	if (put_user(len, optlen)) {
> -		fput(newfile);
> +		if (newfile)

I don't think you need the if() here because for the file to not be
there, retval above will be negative and this part won't be called.

> +			fput(newfile);
>  		put_unused_fd(retval);
>  		return -EFAULT;
>  	}
> -	peeloff.sd = retval;
> +
>  	if (copy_to_user(optval, &peeloff, len)) {
> -		fput(newfile);
> +		if (newfile)

Same here and on sctp_getsockopt_peeloff_flags() below.

  Marcelo

> +			fput(newfile);
> +		put_unused_fd(retval);
> +		return -EFAULT;
> +	}
> +	fd_install(retval, newfile);
> +out:
> +	return retval;
> +}
> +
> +static int sctp_getsockopt_peeloff_flags(struct sock *sk, int len, char __user *optval, int __user *optlen)
> +{
> +	sctp_peeloff_flags_arg_t peeloff;
> +	struct file *newfile = NULL;
> +	int retval = 0;
> +
> +	if (len < sizeof(sctp_peeloff_flags_arg_t))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	len = sizeof(sctp_peeloff_flags_arg_t);
> +	if (copy_from_user(&peeloff, optval, len))
> +		return -EFAULT;
> +
> +	retval = sctp_getsockopt_peeloff_common(sk, &peeloff.p_arg, &newfile, peeloff.flags);
> +	if (retval < 0)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	/* Return the fd mapped to the new socket.  */
> +	if (put_user(len, optlen)) {
> +		if (newfile)
> +			fput(newfile);
> +		put_unused_fd(retval);
> +		return -EFAULT;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (copy_to_user(optval, &peeloff, len)) {
> +		if (newfile)
> +			fput(newfile);
>  		put_unused_fd(retval);
>  		return -EFAULT;
>  	}
> @@ -6758,6 +6815,9 @@ static int sctp_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
>  	case SCTP_SOCKOPT_PEELOFF:
>  		retval = sctp_getsockopt_peeloff(sk, len, optval, optlen);
>  		break;
> +	case SCTP_SOCKOPT_PEELOFF_FLAGS:
> +		retval = sctp_getsockopt_peeloff_flags(sk, len, optval, optlen);
> +		break;
>  	case SCTP_PEER_ADDR_PARAMS:
>  		retval = sctp_getsockopt_peer_addr_params(sk, len, optval,
>  							  optlen);
> -- 
> 2.9.4
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-29 19:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-29 18:13 [PATCH] sctp: Add peeloff-flags socket option Neil Horman
2017-06-29 19:04 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner [this message]
2017-06-29 22:56 ` Al Viro
2017-06-30 15:35 ` [PATCH v2] " Neil Horman
2017-06-30 16:29   ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2017-06-30 17:32 ` [PATCH v3] " Neil Horman
2017-07-01 17:29   ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2017-07-01 22:26   ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170629190405.GL18138@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@domdv.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=vyasevich@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).