From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Kicinski Subject: Re: 'skb' buffer address information leakage Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 22:27:45 -0700 Message-ID: <20170703222745.5f1bb399@cakuba.netronome.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: samuel@sortiz.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qca_merez@qca.qualcomm.com, kvalo@codeaurora.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, oss-drivers@netronome.com, security@kernel.org, wil6210@qca.qualcomm.com To: Dison River Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 4 Jul 2017 13:12:18 +0800, Dison River wrote: > drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_debugfs.c:167 > seq_printf(file, " frag=%p", skb); FWIW that's actually not a skb pointer. The structure is defined like this: struct nfp_net_tx_buf { union { struct sk_buff *skb; void *frag; }; dma_addr_t dma_addr; short int fidx; u16 pkt_cnt; u32 real_len; }; So the line in question is actually reading the frag pointer, I just reused the skb variable, because this has to be read via READ_ONCE() and NULL-checked so I thought that doing it separately for skb and frag is a waste of LOC especially in debug code. I will queue up a clean up for after the merge window. Thanks!