From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jiri Pirko Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2 V3 0/4] RDMAtool Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 20:29:31 +0200 Message-ID: <20170710182931.GG1853@nanopsycho> References: <20170704075541.12544-1-leon@kernel.org> <20170710080230.GD1853@nanopsycho> <20170710160144.GN1528@mtr-leonro.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Stephen Hemminger , Doug Ledford , Ariel Almog , Linux RDMA , Linux Netdev To: Leon Romanovsky Return-path: Received: from mail-wr0-f196.google.com ([209.85.128.196]:33660 "EHLO mail-wr0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752509AbdGJS3e (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jul 2017 14:29:34 -0400 Received: by mail-wr0-f196.google.com with SMTP id x23so26757148wrb.0 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 11:29:34 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170710160144.GN1528@mtr-leonro.local> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 06:01:44PM CEST, leon@kernel.org wrote: >On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 10:02:30AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 09:55:37AM CEST, leon@kernel.org wrote: >> >Hi, >> > >> >This is third version of series implementing the RDAMtool - the tool >> >to configure RDMA devices. The initial proposal was sent as RFC [1] and >> >was based on sysfs entries as POC. >> > >> >The current series was rewritten completely to work with RDMA netlinks as >> >a source of user<->kernel communications. In order to achieve that, the >> >RDMA netlinks were extensively refactored and modernized [2, 3, 4 and 5]. >> > >> >The following is an example of various runs on my machine with 5 devices >> >(4 in IB mode and one in Ethernet mode) >> > >> >### Without parameters >> >$ rdma >> >Usage: rdma [ OPTIONS ] OBJECT { COMMAND | help } >> >where OBJECT := { dev | link | help } >> > OPTIONS := { -V[ersion] | -d[etails]} >> >> What about json output? You will need it sooner than later. It will >> prevent you from a lot of headaches if you implement it right away. >> Lesson learned... > >I'm planning to do it in the coming kernel cycle. Yeah, just consider pushing it in this initial patchset. Makes sense and saves you troubles. Up to you.