netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen)
To: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@suse.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Subject: Re: commit 16ecba59 breaks 82574L under heavy load.
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 11:27:09 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170721152709.GT18556@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170720234455.7nxtui7shmnzivxd@f1.synalogic.ca>

On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 04:44:55PM -0700, Benjamin Poirier wrote:
> Could you please test the following patch and let me know if it:
> 1) reduces the interrupt rate of the Other msi-x vector
> 2) avoids the link flaps
> or
> 3) logs some dmesg warnings of the form "Other interrupt with unhandled [...]"
> In this case, please paste icr values printed.

I will give it a try.

Another odd behaviour I see is that the driver will hang in
napi_synchronize on shutdown if there is traffic at the time (at least
I think that's the trigger, maybe the trigger is if there has been an
overload of traffic and the backlog in napi was used).

>From doing some searching, this seems to be a problem that has plagued
some people for years with this driver.

I am having trouble figuring out exactly what napi_synchronize is waiting
for and who is supposed to toggle the flag it is waiting on.  The flag
appears to work backwards from what I would have expected it to do.
I see lots of places that can set the bit, but only napi_enable seems
to clear it again, and I don't see how that would get called for all
the places that potentially set the bit.

-- 
Len Sorensen

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-21 15:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-18 14:21 commit 16ecba59 breaks 82574L under heavy load Lennart Sorensen
2017-07-18 23:14 ` Benjamin Poirier
2017-07-19 14:19   ` Lennart Sorensen
2017-07-20  0:07     ` Benjamin Poirier
2017-07-20 14:00       ` Lennart Sorensen
2017-07-20 23:44         ` Benjamin Poirier
2017-07-21 15:27           ` Lennart Sorensen [this message]
2017-07-21 16:09             ` Lennart Sorensen
2017-07-21 18:36               ` [PATCH 1/5] e1000e: Fix error path in link detection Benjamin Poirier
2017-07-21 18:36                 ` [PATCH 2/5] e1000e: Fix wrong comment related to " Benjamin Poirier
2017-09-19  0:13                   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Brown, Aaron F
2017-07-21 18:36                 ` [PATCH 3/5] e1000e: Fix return value test Benjamin Poirier
2017-09-15  0:20                   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Brown, Aaron F
2017-07-21 18:36                 ` [PATCH 4/5] e1000e: Separate signaling for link check/link up Benjamin Poirier
2017-07-21 18:50                   ` Lennart Sorensen
2017-08-02 11:28                   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Neftin, Sasha
2017-08-02 14:34                     ` Lennart Sorensen
2017-08-02 14:49                       ` Benjamin Poirier
2017-09-15  0:27                         ` Brown, Aaron F
2017-07-21 18:36                 ` [PATCH 5/5] e1000e: Avoid receiver overrun interrupt bursts Benjamin Poirier
2017-07-21 18:48                   ` Lennart Sorensen
2017-08-12  2:13                     ` Philip Prindeville
2017-08-12  2:47                       ` Philip Prindeville
2017-08-21 17:17                   ` Benjamin Poirier
2017-09-15  0:38                   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Brown, Aaron F
2017-09-19 18:38                   ` [5/5] " Philip Prindeville
2017-09-19 19:41                     ` Benjamin Poirier
2017-10-24 17:20                       ` Lennart Sorensen
2017-10-24 17:39                         ` Philip Prindeville
2017-09-15  0:18                 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 1/5] e1000e: Fix error path in link detection Brown, Aaron F
2017-07-21 19:02           ` commit 16ecba59 breaks 82574L under heavy load Lennart Sorensen
2017-07-24 21:56           ` Philip Prindeville

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170721152709.GT18556@csclub.uwaterloo.ca \
    --to=lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca \
    --cc=bpoirier@suse.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).