From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 01/10] net: dsa: lan9303: Fixed MDIO
 interface
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 13:07:47 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20170726.130747.9593997952509805.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <87999a6c-4ea8-ba4c-e2db-cdb37c1c8c8a@egil-hjelmeland.no>
        <87lgnbgtiq.fsf@weeman.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
        <20170726175224.GT12049@lunn.ch>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com, privat@egil-hjelmeland.no,
        corbet@lwn.net, f.fainelli@gmail.com, kernel@pengutronix.de,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: andrew@lunn.ch
Return-path: <linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20170726175224.GT12049@lunn.ch>
Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 19:52:24 +0200

>> > So I really want to group the patches into only a few series in order
>> > to not spend months on the process.
> 
> I strongly agree with Vivien here. Good patches get accepted in about
> 3 days. You should expect feedback within a day or two. That allows
> you to have fast cycle times for getting patches in.

+1

Small simple patches will get everything in 10 times fast than if
you clump everything together into larger, harder to review ones.