netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: "Coelho, Luciano" <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Cc: "kvalo@codeaurora.org" <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
	"mcgrof@kernel.org" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	"pieter-paul.giesberts@broadcom.com"
	<pieter-paul.giesberts@broadcom.com>,
	"bjorn.andersson@linaro.org" <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	"arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com" <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>,
	"hante.meuleman@broadcom.com" <hante.meuleman@broadcom.com>,
	"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"keescook@chromium.org" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"alan@linux.intel.com" <alan@linux.intel.com>,
	"moritz.fischer@ettus.com" <moritz.fischer@ettus.com>,
	"pjones@redhat.com" <pjones@redhat.com>,
	"wagi@monom.org" <wagi@monom.org>,
	"pmladek@suse.com" <pmladek@suse.com>,
	"atull@kernel.org" <atull@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 1/2] firmware: add more flexible request_firmware_async function
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 18:31:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170803163102.GA27873@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1501739717.15969.26.camel@intel.com>

On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 05:55:18AM +0000, Coelho, Luciano wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-08-03 at 08:23 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
> > "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> writes:
> > 
> > > > +int request_firmware_nowait(struct module *module, bool uevent,
> > > > +			    const char *name, struct device *device, gfp_t gfp,
> > > > +			    void *context,
> > > > +			    void (*cont)(const struct firmware *fw, void *context))
> > > > +{
> > > > +	unsigned int opt_flags = FW_OPT_FALLBACK |
> > > > +		(uevent ? FW_OPT_UEVENT : FW_OPT_USERHELPER);
> > > > +
> > > > +	return __request_firmware_nowait(module, opt_flags, name, device, gfp,
> > > > +					 context, cont);
> > > > +}
> > > >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(request_firmware_nowait);
> > > >  
> > > > +int __request_firmware_async(struct module *module, const char *name,
> > > > +			     struct firmware_opts *fw_opts, struct device *dev,
> > > > +			     void *context,
> > > > +			     void (*cont)(const struct firmware *fw, void *context))
> > > > +{
> > > > +	unsigned int opt_flags = FW_OPT_UEVENT;
> > > 
> > > This exposes a long issue. Think -- why do we want this enabled by default? Its
> > > actually because even though the fallback stuff is optional and can be, the uevent
> > > internal flag *also* provides caching support as a side consequence only. We
> > > don't want to add a new API without first cleaning up that mess.
> > > 
> > > This is a slipery slope and best to clean that up before adding any new API.
> > > 
> > > That and also Greg recently stated he would like to see at least 3 users of
> > > a feature before adding it. Although I think that's pretty arbitrary, and
> > > considering that request_firmware_into_buf() only has *one* user -- its what
> > > he wishes.
> > 
> > ath10k at least needs a way to silence the warning for missing firmware
> > and I think iwlwifi also.
> 
> Yes, iwlwifi needs to silence the warning.  It the feature (only one,
> really) that I've been waiting for.

Perfect, can you guys send patches on top of these changes? Even though I still
think the flag stuff needs to be worked out I can try to iron that out myself
and fold the rest of the delta, and then I can set a new set out which is much
more suitable.

  Luis

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-03 16:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-31 15:09 [PATCH V5 1/2] firmware: add more flexible request_firmware_async function Rafał Miłecki
2017-07-31 15:09 ` [PATCH V5 2/2] brcmfmac: don't warn user about NVRAM if fallback to the platform one succeeds Rafał Miłecki
2017-08-01 21:20   ` Arend van Spriel
2017-07-31 23:01 ` [PATCH V5 1/2] firmware: add more flexible request_firmware_async function kbuild test robot
2017-08-02 21:30 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-08-03  5:23   ` Kalle Valo
2017-08-03  5:55     ` Coelho, Luciano
2017-08-03 16:31       ` Luis R. Rodriguez [this message]
2017-08-10 17:07       ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-08-10 17:05     ` Luis R. Rodriguez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170803163102.GA27873@wotan.suse.de \
    --to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com \
    --cc=atull@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hante.meuleman@broadcom.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luciano.coelho@intel.com \
    --cc=moritz.fischer@ettus.com \
    --cc=pieter-paul.giesberts@broadcom.com \
    --cc=pjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=wagi@monom.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).