From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
Cc: 'Bjorn Helgaas' <helgaas@kernel.org>,
Roland Dreier <roland@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Emil Tantilov <emil.s.tantilov@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Update ACS quirk for more Intel 10G NICs
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 08:28:13 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170804082813.3162ee15@w520.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6DD004B362@AcuExch.aculab.com>
On Fri, 4 Aug 2017 13:28:32 +0000
David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> wrote:
> From: Bjorn Helgaas
> > Sent: 03 August 2017 22:49
> > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 02:41:01PM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > > From: Roland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>
> > >
> > > Add one more variant of the 82599 plus the device IDs for X540 and X550
> > > variants. Intel has confirmed that none of these devices does peer-to-peer
> > > between functions. The X540 and X550 have added ACS capabilities in their
> > > PCI config space, but the ACS control register is hard-wired to 0 for both
> > > devices, so we still need the quirk for IOMMU grouping to allow assignment
> > > of individual SR-IOV functions.
> ...
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> > > @@ -4335,12 +4335,33 @@ static const struct pci_dev_acs_enabled {
> > > { PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x1507, pci_quirk_mf_endpoint_acs },
> > > { PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x1514, pci_quirk_mf_endpoint_acs },
> > > { PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x151C, pci_quirk_mf_endpoint_acs },
> > > + { PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x1528, pci_quirk_mf_endpoint_acs },
> > > { PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x1529, pci_quirk_mf_endpoint_acs },
> > > + { PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x154A, pci_quirk_mf_endpoint_acs },
> ...
>
> That list is looking a bit long.
> Is it possible to run-time determine that the ACS control register is hard wired
> to zero, and apply the quirk to all such devices.
> Or even changing to a (device & mask) == value test??
In fact, hard-wired ACS doesn't need a quirk at all, please see the
other thread of the discussion. Thanks,
Alex
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-04 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-20 21:41 [PATCH] PCI: Update ACS quirk for more Intel 10G NICs Roland Dreier
2017-07-20 22:15 ` Alex Williamson
2017-07-20 22:53 ` Roland Dreier
2017-07-24 16:45 ` Alex Williamson
2017-07-24 17:18 ` Roland Dreier
2017-07-24 19:01 ` Alex Williamson
2017-07-24 19:31 ` Roland Dreier
2017-07-24 20:57 ` Alex Williamson
2017-07-20 22:50 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2017-08-03 21:49 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-08-03 22:16 ` Alex Williamson
2017-08-04 21:47 ` Roland Dreier
2017-08-04 13:28 ` David Laight
2017-08-04 14:28 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170804082813.3162ee15@w520.home \
--to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=emil.s.tantilov@intel.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roland@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).