From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/9] bpf: add BPF_J{LT,LE,SLT,SLE} instructions Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2017 09:55:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20170809.095553.268665355274669790.davem@davemloft.net> References: <63b41a38e0d58536700c999ade7c2c267bd2613d.1502272924.git.daniel@iogearbox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ast@fb.com, holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com, naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com, jakub.kicinski@netronome.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: daniel@iogearbox.net Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:42134 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754462AbdHIQzy (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Aug 2017 12:55:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <63b41a38e0d58536700c999ade7c2c267bd2613d.1502272924.git.daniel@iogearbox.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Daniel Borkmann Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 12:23:53 +0200 > [1] https://github.com/borkmann/llvm/tree/bpf-insns How is this "backwards compatible"? If someone takes a new LLVM and tries to load those programs into an older kernel they will be rejected. There appears to be no effort to make things work cleanly in that situation at all.