From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/6] rtnetlink: use rcu_dereference_raw to silence rcu splat
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 16:52:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170810145302.30391-2-fw@strlen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170810145302.30391-1-fw@strlen.de>
Ido reports a rcu splat in __rtnl_register.
The splat is correct; as rtnl_register doesn't grab any logs
and doesn't use rcu locks either. It has always been like this.
handler families are not registered in parallel so there are no
races wrt. the kmalloc ordering.
The only reason to use rcu_dereference in the first place was to
avoid sparse from complaining about this.
Thus this switches to _raw() to not have rcu checks here.
The alternative is to add rtnl locking to register/unregister,
however, I don't see a compelling reason to do so as this has been
lockless for the past twenty years or so.
Fixes: 6853dd4881 ("rtnetlink: protect handler table with rcu")
Reported-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
---
net/core/rtnetlink.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
index dd4e50dfa248..a5bc5bd0dc12 100644
--- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
+++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ int __rtnl_register(int protocol, int msgtype,
BUG_ON(protocol < 0 || protocol > RTNL_FAMILY_MAX);
msgindex = rtm_msgindex(msgtype);
- tab = rcu_dereference(rtnl_msg_handlers[protocol]);
+ tab = rcu_dereference_raw(rtnl_msg_handlers[protocol]);
if (tab == NULL) {
tab = kcalloc(RTM_NR_MSGTYPES, sizeof(*tab), GFP_KERNEL);
if (tab == NULL)
--
2.13.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-10 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-10 14:52 [PATCH net-next 0/6] rtnetlink: fix initial rtnl pushdown fallout Florian Westphal
2017-08-10 14:52 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2017-08-10 15:38 ` [PATCH net-next 1/6] rtnetlink: use rcu_dereference_raw to silence rcu splat Ido Schimmel
2017-08-10 14:52 ` [PATCH net-next 2/6] rtnetlink: do not use RTM_GETLINK directly Florian Westphal
2017-08-10 14:52 ` [PATCH net-next 3/6] rtnetlink: switch rtnl_link_get_slave_info_data_size to rcu Florian Westphal
2017-08-10 16:17 ` David Ahern
2017-08-10 14:53 ` [PATCH net-next 4/6] rtnetlink: init handler refcounts to 1 Florian Westphal
2017-08-10 14:53 ` [PATCH net-next 5/6] rtnetlink: fallback to UNSPEC if current family has no doit callback Florian Westphal
2017-08-10 14:53 ` [PATCH net-next 6/6] selftests: add rtnetlink test script Florian Westphal
2017-08-10 16:50 ` [PATCH net-next 0/6] rtnetlink: fix initial rtnl pushdown fallout David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170810145302.30391-2-fw@strlen.de \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).