From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: Performance comparision / qdisc / no qdisc / queueing linux kernel 4.12 Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 16:16:06 -0700 Message-ID: <20170811161606.561b3fbb@xeon-e3> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: =?UTF-8?B?UGF3ZcWC?= Staszewski Return-path: Received: from mail-pg0-f52.google.com ([74.125.83.52]:33212 "EHLO mail-pg0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750714AbdHKXQO (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Aug 2017 19:16:14 -0400 Received: by mail-pg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id u5so20818314pgn.0 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 16:16:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Any of the current qdisc that do rate control are single threaded. Since bandwidth is a shared resource, the qdisc has to acquire a lock and update cache shared data structures. Don't expect HTB or HFSC to be free. > > 4.13-rc3 have kernel panic when deleting qdisc - will try to get panic trace Please do.