From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: "Paweł Staszewski" <pstaszewski@itcare.pl>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com>,
brouer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Kernel 4.13.0-rc4-next-20170811 - IP Routing / Forwarding performance vs Core/RSS number / HT on
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 12:28:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170815122853.0266c971@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3d59ff3b-246b-2f46-2351-31c2d58ca6fe@itcare.pl>
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 12:05:37 +0200 Paweł Staszewski <pstaszewski@itcare.pl> wrote:
> W dniu 2017-08-15 o 12:02, Paweł Staszewski pisze:
> > W dniu 2017-08-15 o 11:57, Jesper Dangaard Brouer pisze:
> >> On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 11:30:43 +0200 Paweł Staszewski
> >> <pstaszewski@itcare.pl> wrote:
> >>> W dniu 2017-08-15 o 11:23, Jesper Dangaard Brouer pisze:
> >>>> On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 02:38:56 +0200
> >>>> Paweł Staszewski <pstaszewski@itcare.pl> wrote:
> >>>>> W dniu 2017-08-14 o 18:19, Jesper Dangaard Brouer pisze:
> >>>>>> On Sun, 13 Aug 2017 18:58:58 +0200 Paweł Staszewski
> >>>>>> <pstaszewski@itcare.pl> wrote:
[... cut ...]
> >>> Ethtool(enp175s0f1) stat: 8895566 ( 8,895,566) <= tx_prio0_packets /sec
> >>> Ethtool(enp175s0f1) stat: 640470657 ( 640,470,657) <= tx_vport_unicast_bytes /sec
> >>> Ethtool(enp175s0f1) stat: 8895427 ( 8,895,427) <= tx_vport_unicast_packets /sec
> >>> Ethtool(enp175s0f1) stat: 498 ( 498) <= tx_xmit_more /sec
> >>
> >> We are seeing some xmit_more, this is interesting. Have you noticed,
> >> if (in the VLAN case) there is a queue in the qdisc layer?
> >>
> >> Simply inspect with: tc -s qdisc show dev ixgbe2
[...]
> > physical interface mq attached with pfifo_fast:
> >
> > tc -s -d qdisc show dev enp175s0f1
> > qdisc mq 0: root
> > Sent 1397200697212 bytes 3965888669 pkt (dropped 78065663, overlimits 0 requeues 629868)
> > backlog 0b 0p requeues 629868
> > qdisc pfifo_fast 0: parent :38 bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
> > Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
> > backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
> > qdisc pfifo_fast 0: parent :37 bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
> > Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
> > backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
[...]
So, it doesn't look like there is any backlog queue. Although, this
can be difficult to measure/see this way (as the kernel empty the queue
quickly via bulk deq), also given the small amount of xmit_more which
indicate that the queue was likely very small.
There is a "dropped" counter, which indicate that you likely had a
setup (earlier) where you managed to overflow the qdisc queues.
> just see that after changing RSS on nics did't deleted qdisc and added
> again:
> Here situation with qdisc del / add
> tc -s -d qdisc show dev enp175s0f1
> qdisc mq 1: root
> Sent 43738523966 bytes 683414438 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 1886)
> backlog 0b 0p requeues 1886
> qdisc pfifo_fast 0: parent 1:10 bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
> Sent 2585011904 bytes 40390811 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 110)
> backlog 0b 0p requeues 110
> qdisc pfifo_fast 0: parent 1:f bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
> Sent 2602068416 bytes 40657319 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 121)
> backlog 0b 0p requeues 121
[...]
Exactly as you indicated above, these "dropped" stats came from another
(earlier) test case. (Great that you caught this yourself)
While trying to reproduce you case, I also managed to cause a situation
with qdisc overload. This caused some weird behavior, where I saw
RX=8Mpps and TX only 4Mpps. (I didn't figure out the exact tuning that
caused this, and cannot reproduce it now).
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-15 10:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-11 17:51 Kernel 4.13.0-rc4-next-20170811 - IP Routing / Forwarding performance vs Core/RSS number / HT on Paweł Staszewski
2017-08-12 12:23 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-08-12 17:27 ` Paweł Staszewski
2017-08-13 16:58 ` Paweł Staszewski
2017-08-14 16:19 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-08-14 16:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-08-14 16:57 ` Paolo Abeni
2017-08-15 0:45 ` Paweł Staszewski
2017-08-15 1:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-08-15 1:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-08-15 9:11 ` Paweł Staszewski
2017-08-15 9:19 ` Paweł Staszewski
2017-08-15 10:05 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-09-21 21:26 ` Paweł Staszewski
2017-09-21 21:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-09-21 21:34 ` Paweł Staszewski
2017-09-21 21:41 ` Florian Fainelli
2017-09-21 21:43 ` Paweł Staszewski
2017-09-21 21:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-09-21 22:07 ` Florian Fainelli
2017-09-22 0:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-10-18 21:49 ` Paweł Staszewski
2017-10-18 21:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-10-18 22:45 ` Paweł Staszewski
2017-09-09 9:03 ` Paweł Staszewski
2017-09-11 16:57 ` Paweł Staszewski
2017-09-11 22:11 ` Paweł Staszewski
2017-08-15 9:35 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-08-15 0:38 ` Paweł Staszewski
2017-08-15 9:23 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-08-15 9:30 ` Paweł Staszewski
2017-08-15 9:57 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-08-15 10:02 ` Paweł Staszewski
2017-08-15 10:05 ` Paweł Staszewski
2017-08-15 10:28 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2017-08-14 0:07 ` Alexander Duyck
2017-08-14 15:07 ` Paweł Staszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170815122853.0266c971@redhat.com \
--to=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pstaszewski@itcare.pl \
--cc=saeedm@mellanox.com \
--cc=tariqt@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).