From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Fastabend Subject: [net-next PATCH 09/10] bpf: selftests: add tests for new __sk_buff members Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 22:33:56 -0700 Message-ID: <20170816053355.15445.70088.stgit@john-Precision-Tower-5810> References: <20170816052338.15445.83732.stgit@john-Precision-Tower-5810> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: tgraf@suug.ch, netdev@vger.kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com, tom@herbertland.com To: davem@davemloft.net, daniel@iogearbox.net, ast@fb.com Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-f194.google.com ([209.85.192.194]:33512 "EHLO mail-pf0-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751159AbdHPFeQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Aug 2017 01:34:16 -0400 Received: by mail-pf0-f194.google.com with SMTP id c65so426957pfl.0 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 22:34:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20170816052338.15445.83732.stgit@john-Precision-Tower-5810> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: This adds tests to access new __sk_buff members from sk skb program type. Signed-off-by: John Fastabend --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 152 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 152 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c index 1b76712..c03542c 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -967,6 +967,158 @@ struct test_val { .result = REJECT, }, { + "invalid access __sk_buff family", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, family)), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access", + .result = REJECT, + }, + { + "invalid access __sk_buff remote_ip4", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, remote_ip4)), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access", + .result = REJECT, + }, + { + "invalid access __sk_buff local_ip4", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, local_ip4)), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access", + .result = REJECT, + }, + { + "invalid access __sk_buff remote_ip6", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, remote_ip6)), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access", + .result = REJECT, + }, + { + "invalid access __sk_buff local_ip6", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, local_ip6)), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access", + .result = REJECT, + }, + { + "invalid access __sk_buff remote_port", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, remote_port)), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access", + .result = REJECT, + }, + { + "invalid access __sk_buff remote_port", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, local_port)), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access", + .result = REJECT, + }, + { + "valid access __sk_buff family", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, family)), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, + }, + { + "valid access __sk_buff remote_ip4", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, remote_ip4)), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, + }, + { + "valid access __sk_buff local_ip4", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, local_ip4)), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, + }, + { + "valid access __sk_buff remote_ip6", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, remote_ip6[0])), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, remote_ip6[1])), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, remote_ip6[2])), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, remote_ip6[3])), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, + }, + { + "valid access __sk_buff local_ip6", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, local_ip6[0])), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, local_ip6[1])), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, local_ip6[2])), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, local_ip6[3])), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, + }, + { + "valid access __sk_buff remote_port", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, remote_port)), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, + }, + { + "valid access __sk_buff remote_port", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, local_port)), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, + }, + { "check skb->mark is not writeable by sockets", .insns = { BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1,